fugufugu-36399 omg cant believe their budget... the actors are prretty good the camera guys are not bad the script is ssshit and its an overall mess. there's plenty of stuff to be watching on TV really. its a waste of time and expectations.the bizarre food guy is much more exciting ...or flossing or whatever.

fedor8 One wedding ring to rule them all, one wedding ring to find them, one wedding ring to bring them all to my house and torture them with my demonic super-powers.Yes, it's a silly movie. It starts off well enough, but the stupidity curve rises exponentially, until the Great Ring of Power destroys the evil demon.The movie's message is basically this: if you lead a wicked life, you will be rewarded by God in the after-life by being given demonic super-powers. Furthermore, you won't be sent to Hell, but get to stay in your house where you can do as you please with anyone who enters it. Famke's ex isn't a ghost; he is a demon. For all practical purposes, his ex has all the powers of Satan in "The Exorcist" times 100. The inevitable conclusion: if you're evil and you die violently trying to kill your long-suffering wife, you get REWARDED in the after-life by having more super-human strength than all the Marvel Comics clowns combined. Your husband beats you? Get the f*** out of the marriage. Leave him. Famke plays one of those masochist wives who endure their husbands' violent behavior for eons until they finally decide to do something about it. I have very little pity for such women. Sure, she eventually made a move to divorce him – which set off the chain of events that got her incarcerated. Nevertheless, any sane and/or smart woman will leave her hubby if he so much as hits her once. This especially goes for women who have no children with the sadist in question. Famke had no reason whatsoever (aside from latent masochism) to stay with the corrupt cop so long, so why should we the audience pity her? Not me.What truly made the movie laughable was the astonishing decision to turn the loot over to a CATHOLIC PRIEST – after which he spontaneously offered her that whole silly confession shtick with her (after which he went back home, got some beers out of the fridge, and Googled "yacht prices"). Rather than give the money to the richest and most powerful sect in the world, it would have made more sense for her to hand it over to that juvenile delinquent kid, help set him straight. Instead, she gets him killed. 100F breaks all the unwritten ghost rules. There is a REASON why ghosts don't behave like Rocky or Rambo and beat the living daylights out of their enemies: because it's stupid and banal. Famke's dead husband is in effect PHYSICALLY present in the house, not as a mere windy apparition but simply as a transparent human; that's what it boils down to, and it's pretty tacky. So death means becoming invisible – yet capable of physical interaction? Again, I am reminded of the movie's idiotic implication that criminals and sadists get REWARDED for their misdeeds rather than punished.Almost as laughable is that nonsense about Famke's "Ghost Ejection Manual" or whatever the hell it's called, and its instructions to "get rid of all the possessions of the deceased". Just one question: what EXACTLY constitutes "personal belongings" in the ghost world? Is the fork Famke's husband used to eat with considered a "personal possession"? The toilet seat? After all, both of them used it, so she should be ridding the house of the toilet seat as well, right? Where the hell do you draw the line between personal possessions and not-personal possessions? Are the walls of the house his personal possessions too?Speaking of which; when she realizes that she still has their wedding ring, she stupidly throws it in the sink – knowing full well he controls EVERYTHING in the house, including the machinery. Why not just throw it out the window or give it to the kid? Predictably (and I mean extremely predictably), getting rid of all that money does not get rid of the ghost, which makes Famke look pretty stupid - yet again.The ghost eventually kills the kid (in an unsuitably over-sadistic scene), and the cops raid the house at almost the EXACT moment the ghost finishes killing him. Great (Hollywood) timing, huh? Apparently, aside from having immense supernatural powers, ghosts of dead criminals also possess hypnotic abilities and send orders telepathically to law-enforcement officers.I find it interesting that Famke was able to simply catch a bus, surrounded by all these people who must have seen her face in the news. And yet, some way or other, she manages to abscond into obscurity. How very dumb. The movie's idiocy is relentless and follows us all the way to the end-credits. One of the dumbest haunted-house flicks ever made.

willie-m-67 Like any movie set in predominately one location this has a low budget feel that for some would make you believe its not capable of providing the frightening entertainment of a big budget blockbuster, and that would be your first mistake with this film!! Your second would be to think it can't offer the big jumps and scares, we'll believe me it does, at one point the phrase "a little bit of poop came out" springs to mind.. The third mistake is to underestimate the script and the suspense filled scenes this movie has to offer. And finally the fourth and worst mistake you could make is to not watch it based on its low budget or its surprisingly low rating!**Next bit may or may not be a spoiler depending on your view**The storyline may not be as original as it gets but the delivery of the story is entertaining and tense luring you in, keeping you on the hook and toying with your nerves. Not following the standard done to death Hollywood scares, this film leads you down the garden path and back up again to seemingly deliver a fright in the places you may expect it from a horror only to leave you waiting on the edge of your seat, and only as you relax and least expect it does it deliver some top quality scares (see previous poop statement).. And this is one of the main reasons I really like this movie.

d b Um, honestly I don't even know what to say about this. This is one of the most pointless films I have ever seen. It feels like a whole bunch of random scenes that do not build or develop anything in any way, and then a bunch of stuff blows up and there's fire everywhere. 2 stars for the absolutely ridiculous CGI ghost explosion scene though (Can't make this stuff up). But seriously, that was the movie. And sometimes there was a ghost. The "story" is barebones at best, with no character motivation or development, and virtually no backstory. The character's actions are arbitrary and nothing holds any meaning or deeper purpose. If you didn't read the synopsis you probably wouldn't have a clue what was going on. Just about the entire movie happens within the house, and there are a total of like 3 characters. Dialogue is basic and vapid. Not sure what they spent the budget on because it certainly wasn't the script, the direction, the sets, or the amateur cgi. There really isn't anything else for me to critique because nothing happened. Avoid unless you're trying to fall asleep.