rzajac Tarantino put it best: Write a good script, and you can afford to damn the torpedoes. 11:14 does exactly that.There's too much to say about it. Production is warm, cozy, perfectly fine. All actors took direction very, very well.But it all rests on the script; a treasure chest of delights, from organization and character, to superbly modulated language register, to a surprising denouement, which (mild spoiler; which you may welcome, as it could aid yr delectation) extremely cleverly sets forth an almost clinically even-steven character mix and then catapults one character into the fore by story's end.Left all warm and fuzzy when I regard the notable star power that (a la Pulp Fiction) likely forewent their usual rates to help breathe life into such a worthy script.Definitely check it out. American film needs more like this.

shadows_million 11:14 is one of those movies that make think after watching it. The film is like pulp fiction in were the story is all mixed around and you see the events that unfold from different perspectives.Every one does a great job in the movie. Patrick Swayze does a great job as a caring father in one probably is last great performance before he died. Colin Hanks, Ben foster and Stark Sands do great as three drunk young ne'er- do-wells. Hilary Swank plays a very convincing dumb store clerk in a bad situation. Finally Rachael Leigh Cook plays a young woman who plays three clueless guys ( Henry Thomas,Blake Heron and Shawn Hatosy). The real star of the movie is the writhing and the directing done by Greg Marcks. A one hit wonder of job is done by Greg. The dialog is fast and funny and the scenes are all greatly shoot in the city night. The only problem I found with the movie was a few sound problems ,but their minor nit picks. All in all 11:14 is a very interesting movie and if you like intertwining stories like Pulp Fiction, Magnolia and Crash, This is the pick for you.

wilsr I didn't know after watching this movie, and I still don't know after reading some of the reviews, whether it was supposed to be a comedy or a convoluted drama.If the intention was to make a comedy, it failed.As drama, the whole scenario was, for me, overwhelmed by the fact that almost no-one in this story of small town mayhem, was at all likable. It may be superficial, but a story only hangs together when at least one character brings you onside. Here, only the cop and Swayze - both, in terms of the plot line, minor characters - evoke any such feeling.Like many people who see the film without knowing anything about it, I wondered what on earth was happening for the first half. Slowly the intertwined narrative became clearer but - because of the lack of empathy with most of the players - I couldn't get terribly enthusiastic about the eventual outcome.I can see moronic, feral juveniles any night outside the local pubs and frankly have little desire to see them portrayed as stars.Technically well made - but: is it a comedy or not? Someone please tell me.

gv-vijai Excellent script good acting Better camera work Nice mood Not a usual horror flick..Worked deeply in script.Good followup in the field.Not a plenty flick.No unnecessary Footage. All together must watch for people who got bored with usual slasher and weekend horror flicks. Must film for guys of age between 16-30.All characters are not full white are not full Grey.All resemble upon the circumstances.Good continuity.Only thing bother is music.Thats not up-to the mark for the film like this.could have been better.Must watch for bored people No second thought about giving 10/10