9 Songs

2004 "2 lovers, one summer, and the 9 songs that defined them."
9 Songs
4.7| 1h9m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 16 July 2004 Released
Producted By: Revolution Films
Country: United Kingdom
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Matt, a young glaciologist, soars across the vast, silent, icebound immensities of the South Pole as he recalls his love affair with Lisa. They meet at a mobbed rock concert in a vast music hall - London's Brixton Academy. They are in bed at night's end. Together, over a period of several months, they pursue a mutual sexual passion whose inevitable stages unfold in counterpoint to nine live-concert songs.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Revolution Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

foxhound-37781 This movie is just downright pathetic. Why? well lets see....1. Boring as all hell 2. Sex scenes for the sake of sex scenes 3. The two actors have no real deep connection on sreen 4. Concert footage looks like it was shot by a 4 year old 5. Film is so quiet it will literally put you to sleep if your watching it after 9pm 6. Boring as all hell 7. Sex sells so naturally this is why everyone was interested in it to begin with. (THE ONLY REASON) 8. Boring as all hell 9. The two actors deliberately kept away from each other off camera so it supposedly wouldn't "Affect their on screen relationship" like seriously what do you hope to achieve by that? 10. A romantic drama that's literally just a softcore porno in disguise. false marketing!
jinsilver This is basically Skinemax with actual penetration. Despite the many protestations that this is high art, not porn, it's basically a series of music videos spliced with a series of amateur sex scenes. In fact, even Cinemax and some actual pornos have more intelligence and better acting. The only way this can have any depth is if you invent your own narrative out of whole cloth.Not that I'm faulting them for making it. Some scenes were kind of hot. It just failed to be anything more than music+sex, even when stretching for a meaningful existential connection to something. In the end, claiming it's anything deeper than what it is would be delusional, so check it out for the sex and the music.At least it looks like real sex, not brazzers sex.
videorama-759-859391 I do love this movie. When seeing it again in 2008, after a three year absence, I loved it more, so much, I watched it again, as having bought the DVD, while I was in Sydney. It was taken off the shelves in Adelaide, within about two weeks. Yes the film is very daring, and explicit, and sexy Stilley, a former model, is hot as an American student. Her acting's not. It's more done, if for naturalism. You would of seen her in that M and M's add in a green sweater, where here, she's naked for most of it. The English boyfriend, who's interesting occupation, takes him to the Antarctic, he loves so much, was a job angle I loved. Original. Stilley has struck up a hot relationship with him, where Kieren O'Brien is incredibly dull to watch, though likable, delivering an utterly terrible performance almost of void, but again too, it's done for naturalism, which is the feel I've got from the film. I don't know if these actors hailed from the same acting school as the leads from Open Water. This adult feature, that does border on porn, one scene, that pushed the envelope, which I imagine, was removed from the shelves, after a complaint, is really a love story strung together by an abundance of sex scenes, one after the other that involves a lot of lovemaking, where a beautiful thing is going on there, punctuated by rock concert scenes, featuring songs and music I loved. There's one small argument, that Stilley, with her character of vitality and looseness sparks up, which I wish had eventuated into more. At times her character is obnoxious. She does have her moods. Thank god we have her, to bring life into the relationship, in contrast to the distrait O'Brien. It does pain and sadden us, when the two part, at the end, after all the sex and love they've been through, where it is affecting, a too fitting titled, if punishing song attached to it. In fairness the 69 minute movie has the look of a half finished project, or it is, as if the other half of the movie went missing, where they're are only a couple of things that hold it together, but their things the audience love, that compensates for the notion, that may'be it's not really meant to be taken for a movie, but a very explicit and sexy experience, where those easily offended by raw sex, nudity, should steer clear. Dialogue too is scarce, of minimum number, one line has Stilley looking in the mirror, asking O'Brien, "Do I look like a boy". Check out her bare body, while she says that, you'll pick up on something that will have you answering "Yes", but I don't want to get too personal. Definitely for art house lovers, or people, who want to get their rocks off.
Charles Herold (cherold) This is not a movie. This is blandly shot concert footage interspersed with scenes of two actors having sex. The sex isn't really very good as porn, but it's not really good as anything else either; it makes naked people having unsimulated sex about as boring as possible, neither meaningful no hot. It doesn't portray a relationship, just sex. There is more story in the typical porn movie than there is in this thing.The music is horrible. If you don't hate the music that will definitely help in enjoying this movie, but even if you like it, this is not interesting concert footage.My girlfriend told me she could only make it through the first 10 minutes of this movie. That was my limit too.