nungerskov It was a dramatic, nice and lovely movie. It's a perfect movie, and I loved to watch it. The movie is a bit long and drawn out, but I loved it anyway

Lee Eisenberg I had heard a few things about Tupac Shakur before his murder in 1996. At that point I didn't know much about rap. It was over the next few years that I started hearing rap and understanding that it was the voice of the ghetto."All Eyez on Me" makes Shakur's life look like a 15-year-old boy's fantasy: always getting to be around scantily clad women. While it also looks at the factors that led to the rise of hip-hop - poverty and police brutality - the movie doesn't really give a sense of why Shakur became the person that the world knows. I don't recommend it.PS: The movie mentions Assata Shakur. She was Tupac's godmother (unrelated to him). Imprisoned on charges of killing a police officer, she escaped jail and fled to Cuba, where she remains to this day.

phillawrence-32142 Having watched and enjoyed "Notorious" I was expecting more of the same, I was totally wrong. It comes across as preachy and whiny,but the biggest sin is that it's just so boring, how they managed to do that to Tupacs story is beyond me.

jerrycoliver So I don't review unless a movie is really bad or really good. This is the former. It really is best viewed as white noise, something playing on TV while you do something else.It kind of went straight to that level in the first 5 minutes. The most horrible and cliche gimmick in any movie is a when the story is being told by the main character to a camera. "Sex, Lies and Videotapes" is the only exception for this working because it was the first time it was done. Then the "interview" on the courthouse steps by Tupac's mother was so horrible. It just is the worst thing in the movie. It's another cliche and it's not done well.Basically the whole movie is a cliche, it's like the writer had a mad lib for writing a script. By the way, writing is up there with directing and art department for worst part of the movie.The acting was stiff, though I don't blame them, the script sucked. Most actors are good and maybe they look like the people in real life, but they sure didn't get the characters, never once was I thinking I was watching anything other an average actor who just reads lines rather than becomes a character.The other reviews here are correct, it really is just random scenes with no story, most of which are completely here say. The facts about Tupac are confused with the character of Tupac. Meaning, there's a lot of fake news about his life, but people love the idea of Tupac the legend rather than Tupac the real life person. If you're making a movie, pick one or the other, don't mix truth and fiction.It's a straight to DVD movie that looks like it could have been released in 2002, in the same vain as Benny's other movies. Though I am happy Digital Underground was featured, people forget that was Tupac's first rap character, then he started copying Easy E's gangsta style.