BloodRayne

2005 "Revenge never tasted so sweet."
3| 1h35m| R| en| More Info
Released: 22 October 2005 Released
Producted By: Herold Productions
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.bloodrayne-themovie.com/main/index.html
Synopsis

In 18th-century Romania, after spending much of her life in a traveling circus, human-vampire hybrid Rayne escapes and plots to take down her father, Kagan, the evil vampire king. When she's discovered by three vampire hunters, she manages to convince them to spare her life and join her cause. But slaying a vampire as powerful as Kagan will be no easy task.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Herold Productions

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Thetwocentreviewbot I got this for 2 dollars and it included a computer video game with it. I should have just played the video game and rested my Triple gulp on the movie disc.Yes it is kind of my fault. You see whenever you combine a video game plot with director Uwe Boll you are asking for it. This movie delivers.A bloodletting of all senses and reason. I will start with one point that should offend any movie fan anywhere. This movie contains Ben Kingsley and Meatloaf . Oh I wish Kingsley's vampire character had feasted on a loaf of tar tare , but no I meant the "singer".Of course the "plot" is laughable. A sort of Angel meets Days of our lives. Also not that original . Yes , moody Troubled disaffected vamp broods about the unfairness of it all and the evil it is. I have to admit Kristanna Lokken looks better to me than David Boreanaz. Beyond that statement lies a compliment to Leelee Sobieski for simply knowing better. The rest of the cast is either half heart-ed or asleep at the frame. Who can blame them.I should give Billy Zane credit as the one who came off best , but I like him and don't want to insult his career by ever suggesting this turn is resume worthy.What did I expect? Boll movies have a reputation for being what they are. None the less a review was deserved.
pontram I want to strike a blow for a movie that seems to be one of the worst movies, when you follow the ratings and verdicts here. But it's easy here to rate one star without watching a movie, and also without giving one thought to.Of course it isn't an artwork, a masterwork, or comparable to high budget productions a la Lord Of The Rings. Instead, it fits right into a solid line of straight-to-video productions, or some bigger TV Adventure movies, but is definitively enjoyable for people who don't expect a lifetime experience from Uwe Boll. But at least, one have to respect the genre outside the Tolkien realm. If not, the movie has no chance at all.It is a simple story about a girl that wants revenge for the killing of her mother by her father, who is the most powerful Vampire, and also wants to be ruler of the world. Kristanna Loken as Rayne does a good Job being sexy, powerful and filled with hate and blood hunger. The others are OK, and Ben Kingsley does keep a low profile, because he has not very much to do except being old Ben Kingsley. Directing is not great, I admit that, it is at max, zealous. Definitevly it is better than in any of the infamous Asylum Movies i've seen, in terms of storytelling, actors leading and so on. The only one bigger mistake is that the short history of Raynes romance with Sebastian is revealed at the end of the movie, so that the short sex scene with him looks quite unfounded.If there wouldn't be so much blood and gore, it could pass as a movie for youngsters. I remember watching such movies (of course without gore and without nudity), when I was ten or twelve.
black_rose0997 I know a lot of people didn't really like this movie. However, I didn't think it was a bad movie at all. I actually enjoyed it.The only thing that I thought was completely stupid was the pointless sex scene. Sex scenes are okay if done in a proper way, but the sex scene in this movie was just stupid and pointless. She walks out of the cell and attempts to bite some guy and then for some reason she decides not to bite him and instead disrobes him and herself to have sex with him. She barely knew the guy and for no apparent reason decides to have sex with him. Completely pointless and unrealistic (I'm aware that movies don't have to be realistic, but come on! It was just all wrong).
Chris Habermehl OK, I am locking my doors as I write this but really people! Look I know the movie bombed, I know the director is a dumb nut but by sitting here and writing for two hours about how watching the movie was such a waste of time - you are only wasting more time! I am so sick of how reviews pick what you watch, play, and buy now-days! I thought it was a neat little movie!, A bit cheap and heavy on the phony blood but not that bad all around. What does make the movie look bad is when you jump online and read a huge amount of errors in the movie so you can be looking for them.I think that if I had just watched the movie it would have been good. Bottom line, watch something if you want to know what you think of it, don't let others witch and moan and keep you from getting your own opinion.