justinm-160-831648 I say apparently, because the quote was so grossly wrong, I couldnt trait a studio that did that to produce a good movie. So I stopped. Watching and having checked this site, I was spot on. an idiot would have been able to spot that it was wrong, yet the studio put it through and it was supposed to define the movie. The quote," there can not be good without evil. Everything in existence must co-exist in a sort of balance or symmetry. St Augustine"sort of,....SORT OF, what 430 AD philosophical writers did they think uses the words sort off. If you going to be making up crap, at least do a good job and don't ask you 12 year old to make up a quote for you. St Augustine actually said that Good can exist without evil, and that evil can not exist without good. As evil us a defect in good and that defect and that defect only is evil. Completely different from the drivel they expounded on

jcjs333 I haven't seen a flick this bad in quite awhile. For starters, like other illiterate shows, the dialogue has , at least , 100 vulgar, trashy, totally unnecessary 'words', mostly the 'f--k' word. The 'f--k' word used to have an 'impact' when used sparingly to give ooomph to an attitude. In this show the use of 'dirty' words, stupid dialogue is exploding all over the screen and , for me , nothing but irritating. I watched about 15 minutes of this awful fiasco but couldn't handle anymore. This is a lousy movie. Acting is poor. I'd have to force myself to watch this but someone would have to pay me. There's nothing about this flick worth diddly.

Darby2221 That's the point to which I got in the movie - and the number I wanted to call to get me out of it. After Sean Astin says, "Do you have something for me my son?" I had to give up. Sorry! That has to be one of the most clichéd things for a priest to say and was the last straw in about the shortest time I've ever given up on a movie. Please - if this movie got better around the 10:11 mark or so - please let me know and I'll give it another shot.The acting looked sub par, the mood felt sub par, the dialogue didn't even MAKE IT to sub par. I've watched some of Sean's...shall we say...lesser works...("Adopting Terror" anyone?)...and managed to sit it through but this was abysmal.

elavigne7885 Danny Glover, a good actor, many fine performances in the past, must be in need of money to associate his name with this piece of trash. I am sure this film will never be shown in any cinema, in any European country, the United States, Canada, Australia, etc. This is one of those films, here today,gone tomorrow, forget it ever existed. If this film is released on DVD, in your neighbourhood, avoid it like the plague. So far all the reviews, I have read, before my review, have stated similar reviews. Danny Glover, true, their may not be too many roles out in the film industry for you to star in, but do not perform in these type of films.