gridoon2018 "Earth" is little more than an updated version of Disney's True-Life Adventures (the bit with the ducks' "maiden flight", for example, is directly re-created), with advanced (though not hugely! - those documentaries were ahead of their time) technology, time-lapse photography, and in some cases what looks like digital trickery. There is still enough magnificent imagery and incredible camera work to make this worthwhile, but I think I preferred the 70-minute format of the earlier documentaries (this one goes on for 95). *** out of 4.

Cristian Danilo I only was a child when i saw this movie but i think is one of the best documentary films ever made. Is no only the incredible way how is narrated the three stories of family animals, is how we can feel really close to feel what animals could feel and that is something very different of every documentary films. On this film you will be expecting the full one and a half our about what would be next. Of course it supposed to be a movie where you learn abut nature, but this experience is something incredible.far of 2007 i think that nowadays is a good way of remember what we lost across the years.

saad hayat The portrayal of nature was amazing, because its clips are taken from the wonderful 'Planet Earth'. It seemed not only the feature film version, but also a more global warming and conservation adjusted version. However, the storytelling seemed a bit loose and the transitions from story to story were a bit clumsy. The narration was a bit let down at first but as I kept watching it became difficult to take. It was so dull. I watched the US version/narration. At some places, it was difficult to understand the wording of the narrator, where I had to rewind and listen to it again to get a better hearing. I'm not complaining about David Attenborough not narrating, it's just that this narrator does a brilliant job at turning this visual masterpiece into a drab and unclear audio experience. Since, in this documentary the narration was absolutely essential to get the information through, this vague narration scored really poorly, in my opinion.

peter_hyde I suffered through it, but wasn't disappointed. A contradiction? No - the titles gave me a good idea of what to expect. Almost anything under the Wide World of Disney banner will be a let-down to anyone over the age of five. It really should have a warning "The following programme is not suitable for those expecting a documentary". Disney obviously haven't improved since The Living Desert; one of the greatest documentaries ever made has been reduced to the pretty-pictures-of-baby-animals-and-scenery level. If you want to see how it should be done, watch the original BBC version with the guy who knows what he's doing, David Attenborough. At least I saw it on a commercial station, so the the ads provided some relief!