funtasticfour
First of all, I'm not rich. Never have been, never will be. Everything I've ever achieved, I've struggled to get there myself, as probably most of the world. And I have rich friends, well, not filthy rich, but richer than myself by a good deal. It's a struggle sometimes, seeing them take tons of holidays, or just upgrading vehicles with ease. Therefore, I imagined this movie would be for me-and it is, in a way...but I couldn't relate to Jennifer Anniston's character as, I'm a guy, and married. Also some of the guys she dated infuriated me. I'm sure it's a real situation for others, but none of the characters fit myself. But they were good characters that all felt real on some level. It was nice to see a week in the life of these very different people. I see some other reviewers likened this to a tv series, and I wholly agree. I didn't feel fulfilled at the end with all the different situations, whereas I would have really enjoyed continuing with these characters. Possibly even a serial series that switches characters out every few months-I would love to see stories closer to my own. I'd love to write for such a series. Overall, I'm glad I watched it.
secondtake
Friends with Money (2006)Another interesting Nicole Holofcener film starring Catherine Keener, though not as inventive or funny or convincing as their more recent "Please Give." This is a tale of three and a half couples, and that's a lot of main characters to establish, especially given their relative similarity--all are white, well heeled, urban (and urbane), educated, and articulate. They are all friends, and there are some establishing scenes with all seven characters talking around a table, a little like some of Woody Allen's restaurant scenes.Oh, Woody Allen? Speaking of white, well heeled, etc. etc. Though being Jewish is not a salient part of the mix here, removing a series of stereotypes and jokes that Allen uses so well. The humor and satire and sometimes social criticism is largely cultural, and seemingly mainstream (since we all wish we were rich, at least on some days). But Woody Allen is frankly a better writer than Holofcener, at least so far (again, "Please Give" does resonate better), and I think his sense of physical presence, with the camera weaving around heads, or in other scenes of simple ambiance and old fashioned beauty, is not matched here.And this matters--the writing and camera-work--because there is no single event that turns the story here. In fact, there is very little that happens at all except a glimpse into a little bit of America, like "Sex and the City" (which Holofcener was involved with) but without the single girl on the prowl edge. If this movie is striving for poignancy within the ordinary, it gets halfway there, and half of poignant is something insufficient, yet still interesting.Most of all, the movie has a cast of great actors, all of them. The four women at the center of this (sound familiar?) are stellar: McDormand, Keener, Cusack (Joan), and Aniston (who plays the single girl of the bunch). The husbands are less known, and maybe less effective, though the gay-leaning husband of the McDormand character, played by Simon McBurney. And you can watch the movie just for the acting, and for some of the scenes, which are either powerful or funny in ways that make the other scenes, which are neither, worth waiting through. None of it is bad, so the people who give this a one star rating just didn't click with the slice-of-life aspect at work here.For the best short summary of the plot and the characters and actors, check out the editorial review at Amazon for the DVD (better than wikipedia this time). Notice also the range of reviews by customers, from top to bottom.
Greg Debniak
I rarely watch movies a 2nd time within a 3-yr period but I just watched this again recently and was, again, impressed. I enjoyed the character development and found myself rooting for Jennifer Anniston's character throughout. It's already a bit dated but that didn't interfere with my enjoying it a 2nd time.My only disappointment was the ending which left me wanting more. I'm surprised this movie wasn't picked up and turned into a television series. It begs further story development as Jennifer's character seems to finally find some resolution and the other characters' lives begin to change in interesting ways but the viewer is left hanging.I would have rated it higher if I could have felt some closure for all of the characters but now I feel empty-handed and wondering about the lives of these people after the last scene. I suppose that is what a good story is supposed to do. There really isn't that much of a story here, it's just very well done character development and some excellent acting. The kicker is: where's the REST of the story?
