Joel Y. Don't let the haters dissuade anyone from checking this out... Any TRUE Metal Gear Solid fan will enjoy it for what it is. A little more insight into the hero we all love, Solid Snake. Given the lack of funding, professional actors or a big name studio, the movie is excellently well done. There is some bad acting, poor production value and it's somewhat uneventful through the middle but even i can tell it is building toward a climax in the next movie. Hopefully the excellence of Solid Snake in this film will give Hive Productions a few more sponsors for the next film. If the could put together a film as good as this from nothing i cant wait to see what they can bring us with some financial backing.

psychomantis8 Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy is a non-profit fan-made movie based on the popular Meal Gear saga. The first part has an hour runtime and is part one of the Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy trilogy. Directed, written by and starring it is Italian film student, Giacomo Talamini as Solid Snake, the movie's premise takes the viewer into the unknown time between Metal Gear Solid and Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty. It is here where he is asked to recover an American senator, Abraham Bishop (Giovanni Contessotto, voiced by Adam Behr) from Daskasan, at the request of his son. The story unfolds as Snake is partnered up with skilled, but boyish sniper, Pierre Leclerc (Lucien Dodge, voiced by Harrison Bishop) and a seemingly troubled soldier, Elizabeth Laeken (Patrizia Liccardi, voiced by Laura Post).Talamini has stated very explicitly that this movie was entirely fan-made, and came together with the aid of volunteers and amateur actors. The budget of approximately 9000 € was completely out of their own pockets and it clearly shows, both for better and for worse.The movie itself is a very well put-together production. Talamini is clearly gaining his stride in the first half of the movie, but the cinematographic quality rises above and beyond amateur direction for the second half with great filming quality and choice of scenes. The locations chosen are simply superb, and where they lack in natural scenery, the graphics department is quick to assist. Don't be fooled – this is no highschool computer science project. The CGI, of course, is not to par with any Hollywood cinematics, but it is definitely impressive.One of the most noteworthy and impressive aspects of the movie is Phillip Sacramento, the voice actor for Snake. It is probably one of the most important aspects to fans and he does a fantastic job, and does not leave fans disappointed at all. The movie also closes with a beautiful song by Aoife. Aoife is the woman who brought you the opening title song of the original Metal Gear Solid, and she volunteered her vocal talents for Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy.The storyline however, leaves a lot to be imagined. Many mysterious concepts are introduced into the movie that are not explained. The only real qualms I have with the movie is the quality of the acting (which is slightly above average), and some of the character development. However, none of these aspects are terribly disheartening as 2 parts remain in the trilogy.If my two cents are not enough, I'm sure Hideo Kojima's certainly is. He was quoted on his twitter as saying (in response to if he had watched Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy): "Of course I did. It's awesome. I felt like crying for their love towards Metal Gear. It's also a well made movie. I can't wait to see next part." For the devoted fan (and Hideo Kojima), Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy is a great tribute to the gaming series that we have come to love. It will not garner new fans but will definitely impress the dedicated ones.For more information, and to watch the movie, visit the official website at http://www.mgs-philanthropy.net/

Phelan_Patrick weak script, terrible acting, not a single believable moment.regardless that, action is sleep-inductive. By the title line, this movie is supposed to "resemble" (from the intro: based on) the metal gear universe, but it definitely doesn't.I started watching this time ago then I sadly quit after a while, then I decided to give it another try after reading (with disbelief) the positive reviews. Watching it fully didn't changed much my mind however, as the final (and only) action sequence is just plain random and definitely, on screen, non-tactical as anything in MGS-fashion should (...if) be.CG is fake, nothing visually spectacular to miss out anyway and ridiculous moments (balancing the many, "brilliant", dialogue lines) are frequent, like the final fight against the metal gear, which is ultimately tragic.through the story there are some briefing sequences focusing on some kind of vague political intrigue, which is, theoretically OK(by that, I don't necessarily mean viewing some naive windows moviemaker-made blue menu mixed with war footage spam popped out on screen into an internet spam-repertoire slideshow) but as the actual action begins nothing else is revealed or gets evolved, not a single twist until you figure out the story just turned out to be a journey-like ride and any military or politic background references are merely inconsistent. Then, characters are clearly over the edge but regardless the performance dorkiness, there's nothing interesting about to live up with the general (boring) situation.The movie runs so slow you'll beg for something to happen until the final battle which shows some production effort but the several nonsensical sequence(s) and the general randomness makes it weak on contents just as the rest of the movieOne strange thing about this I've noticed, I don't know why, (probably everything is just too messy) this is not even one of those flicks where you're pretty sure about what to expect after you've watched the first 20 minutes (if you are) from the rest of the presentation, so you can consider it as a good, artsy feature, if you feel.budget is a missing key factor here by what I've understood, so I give 3 out of 10 for the effort even something like this would deserve something below 0 on standard parameters.

a_nonsense_name When I first started to watch this it seemed like it was off to a good start. Snake seemed to feel just about right and the atmosphere was gritty with a decent amount of visual affects given the incredibly low budget.However, around midway through the script took a turn for the worse. The female lead doesn't suit what she's trying to play. It feels forced and unnatural. Seeing the secondary male playing a DS when he's found is also off color for the series as a whole.At the later end of the film it gets to the point where its unrecognizable as a part of the Metal Gear ideas. While much of the games did have some sort of odd occurrence or seemingly supernatural act, there was truly only one character who's abilities went completely unexplainable by technological means (anyone who's reading this should already know who I'm talking about.) this one had it rather ramped throughout and somehow I doubt it'll be explained so easily, if at all, in the next installment.Overall I give them a B+ for the effort that they put into it, and it does show because having done 3D modeling work myself I can say its no easy feat to put something together, then implement it into something outside the modeling program. However, the poor acting ability, the laundry list of Metal Gear universe errors, and forced 'romance' really drag down the film as a whole.