Nothing Left to Fear

2013 "Let Us Prey."
Nothing Left to Fear
4.4| 1h40m| R| en| More Info
Released: 04 October 2013 Released
Producted By: Anchor Bay Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Wendy, her husband Dan and their kids have just moved to the small town of Stull, Kansas, where Dan is the new pastor. But in this sleepy community of friendly neighbors, a horrific series of occurrences awaits them: Their teenage daughter is being tormented by grisly visions. Her younger sister has been marked for a depraved ritual. And deep within the heartland darkness, one of The Seven Gates of Hell demands the blood of the innocent to unleash the creatures of the damned.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Anchor Bay Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Pie CatLady The film's faults are clear in other reviews. Slow-to-no-action pacing with major plot-points left unexplained. Why didn't they start with the legend of Stull, Kansas? Surely one of the kids would have done what I'll have to do - Google the place to find out... With limited character development, piddling special effects, and few decent scares, the film squanders an interesting premise. There's one good aspect which led me to give it a kind 5 rating: Ethan Peck (Gregory Peck's grandson with grandpa's macho steely manner) and the two gals, Rebekah Brandes and Jennifer Stone - 28, 29, and 21 at filming thus pseudo-teens - are attractive young folk. Let's wish them better luck in their future flicks.
FountainPen I cannot recall having seen even one decent movie featuring Anne Heche; she seems to be jinxed and to be a jinx. In this flick she mumbles and swallows her lines, slurring many words in that irritating nasal style favoured by so many very young girls today: odd because Ms Heche is not a young girl. This absurd, time-waster film starts predictably, continues predictably, ends predictably, with no compelling scenes or real character development. At least the first several minutes had some light balance, but most of the remainder was shot in almost darkness -- probably to help hide the abysmal fx and pathetic acting. What can I say on a positive note about this cinematic experience? Well, it's over and I will never see it again! ADDENDUM: "aprilcathcart1965" rates it 9/10, but this is the ONLY movie that "aprilcathcart1965" has reviewed ... a crew or cast member or friend or relative? Ridiculous !!
David Arnold Pastor Dan, his wife Wendy, and their three children Rebecca, Mary, and Christopher, have just moved to the small town of Stull, Kansas, where Dan will serve as the new pastor, taking over from pastor Kingsman. Unfortunately, after only a couple of days in town, things start to take a turn for the worse after Mary is taken ill and then kidnapped by one of the town's residents. It's here we find out that there is much more than meets the eye with pastor Kingsman and the other residents in the idyllic town of Stull.For all the criticising that this film received, it's actually not all that bad. It's not that good, but it's not as bad as what a lot of people have been saying about it.It starts off decent enough, and the story develops OK as it carries on, but it doesn't pick up much more after a certain point and seems to just stammer along at times.The biggest complaint story-wise for me is that it never explains why the town is the way it is, so there's a really a big hole there. If there was an explanation for it then it might have been that wee bit better but your left to just try and pick out the bones and come up with your own conclusions.Another unfortunate aspect is that it's not really all that scary. There are a few moments in it which are quite creepy, but other than that it is pretty lacking.By the way, the special effects for the demon aren't as bad as what some people have said either and are actually pretty decent, especially considering the films budget.Anyway, if this is as good as Slash can get when producing films, it's best that he doesn't leave his day job.
Saiph90 Watched this last night and thought it was not the worst film I have watched lately and did not stink the place out {on the plus side it was free on Sky, well free in the sense I did not pay any more than the exorbitant Sky monthly fee} I then went to see other peoples reviews and have started to think I have become immune to bad films, I know why, I have watched some dirge, here is my list of abysmal films,The Silent House Greystone Park Last Passenger Black Rock Magic Magic Devil's Due The Double Vanishing on 7th Street The Darkest hour Battleshipand of course 'The Innkeepers' which I must have been drunk or ridiculously generous in giving it more than 1 star, this is the film which has what appears to be CCTV footage of someone putting the bins out, which has no relevance to the story plot etc. and I wondered if it had been cut by accident into the film, unfortunately this was one of the better parts of the film. Anyway back to Nothing to Fear, story, a pastor relocates from the city to a rural community {the story a bit like but no where in the same league as the original Wicker man} which unfortunately sits above the gates of hell. One of the daughters is chosen and is sacrificed to close the gates. not sure why they opened it in the first place but like a lot of stuff in the film you could drive a horse and trap through the holes in the plot. So the acting a touch wooden, script pretty bland, plot OK, shocks, well none, plus parts I could hear it without cranking it up to 30 on the TV and it was OK, dammed through faint praise?