movie god We have all heard about this movie, but lets drop the act and talk about why we really want to see this: Tom Logan...The film begins in Connecticut (I know I'm sorry, but try to soldier on). The audience is then taken through a journey, which is as memorable as Citizen Cane and as tasteful as European Porn.This film shares great similarities with the Godfather, except for the plot, the quality of the acting, the budget, the reviews, the scope, the drama, and the overall ability of everyone involved.I would caution audiences against the violence in addition to the graphic graphic graphic sexuality (all of which involves Tom Logan, sometimes even just by himself). Linda Blair from the Exorcist commented that, "This is messed up! Seriously! Way too disturbing for film! I mean come on, it's Tom Logan!" So if you're looking for a warm family film to take the kids to, I would highly recommend this for people of all ages. However, if you take your wife she will leave you for Tom Logan...it will happen.

larry_w14 Rented(free rental thank goodness) this as supposedly filmed in CT where I live....could have been filmed in a tunnel for all that matter! Dark ninety percent of time, and just an awful attempt at a low budget flick, which can be good if done right. In a nutshell about a bunch of young adults who witness meteor fall, and subsequently fall prey to aliens on a lighthouse island, assisted by keeper and wife. Analysis:acting = dreadfulwriting = uninspiredstory = done a million times before with different settingsproduction values = okay (lighting) for budgeteffects (creature, digital, other) HORRIBLE,VERY CHEAP LOOKINGSo, you get the gist of it. To add insult to injury, end credits has bloopers of filming - really now......who cares! Distributed under a Universal company, shocked they would even do so after viewing.Finally as alternative, try "CREEP". Low budget, but well written, well acted, and fairly, well, creepy!

dpfrey This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. The highlight of the movie is a comparison between the smell of natural gas and a dirty vagina. The acting is pathetic. I know acting is hard work and stuff, but that's why it should be left to real actors. Watching these people act is like watching Michael J. Fox perform brain surgery. It's shaky at best. One of the other comments would have you believe that the movie is saved by the acting talents of Dan Gordon as Chris. Only Dan himself or maybe his mother could believe that was good acting. The special effects in this movie were terrible. The worst special effects were for the gas explosion in the lighthouse. It looked like someone was shining an orange light up from the bottom of a model constructed from a refrigerator box. Sure there was a little bit of computer animation layered over top, but it didn't help. I suspect that the special effects on this movie were created and rendered using a single Amiga computer from the late 80s.

Art Brainard (TheKingofSwing) Overall ten times better then I thought it would be. effects could have been better. A different plot idea that allows for a couple of twists, but has a species kind of feel. There are a few really funny moments and the acting is tolerable for the entire movie, which is a rarity now a days. In my opinion there was only one real star of this movie, but I'll leave that up to you to decide. The location was good and it's nice to see more people filming movies in connecticut. I enjoyed watching it though and look forward to future releases from this director and film company. just roll up a blunt and enjoy it for what it's worth.