tigrexthrasher Zzzzzzzzzzz Eh hmm sorry didnt notice you was still snoozing after watching this movie. It is a very dull movie because you dont feel motivated for any of the characters. There all doing stuff but you dont care why. Mainly because theres far to little action in it. The sets and costumes are really the only good things about the film. And RC and CB are both ok. Anyway avoid the film it sucks.

cinemajesty Movie Review: "Robin Hood" (2010)An early-on World Premiere at Cannes Film Festival in its 63rd Edition, "Robin Hood" reinvented to a medieval-warfare-realism approach by director Ridley Scott delivers action-adventure-entertainment all around with a committed as matching leading couple portrayed by Cate Blanchett as Marion and Russell Crowe as Robin.If the audience expected witches at black masses, they are in the wrong movie. This "Robin Hood" comes closer to Ridley Scott's signature-defining masterpiece "Gladiator" (2000), which nevertheless shows the patience and pacing of a matured director in this one and only 130-Minute theatrical cut by long-term collaborator at Scott Free productions editor Pietro Scalia, sharing massive depth-of-field in fulminate-translated 200-Million-Dollar production budget towards green-dominated rural English landscapes, on-set location of taking action with hand, sword, bow and arrow, accompanied by down-to-earth convincing property as costume designs by Janty Yates.Director Ridley Scott convinced by shooting a Three-Camera-Capturing-System executed to full immersive states of tracking, pushing, pulling and booming camera angles of superior production values by cinematographer John Mathieson preaching utmost hyper-realism in elements of fire, earth and water; decisive moments when "Robin Hood" (2010) is able to exceed the further comic-beats-entertaining "Prince of Thieves" starring Kevin Costner, Morgan Freeman and Alan Rickman as Sheriff of Nottingham of summer 1991. This "Robin Hood" should have been a smash hit of Holiday Season 2010/2011, when a summer-leisure-seeking target audience of the young, beautiful adult identifying with supporting cast was not sufficient conviction in a nevertheless gripping screenplay by Brian Helgeland, blessed in ranging plot-interpretations from actor Oscar Isaac over actress Léa Seydoux to Mark Strong as menacing Robin's character nemesis Godfrey, when acting mastery by William Hurt and Max von Sydow brings additional calmly-received empathetic relations in constant-conflicting, fight-for-your-right characters translated into cold-winter-months pleasures and thrills of several-watches-possible, high-end motion picture entertainment.© 2018 Felix Alexander Dausend (Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC)

trevor_trotman This film wouldn't have been so bad if it had been called something other than Robin Hood. As it is, apart from some of the character names, it has nothing to do with the legend of Robin Hood. Obviously the use of the title Robin Hood was a cynical attempt to get bums on seats. Ridley Scott should be thoroughly ashamed of himself for peddling this trash.

emre-islek There are dozens of adaptations of Robin Hood. All of them are appreciated. But this movie is the worst of the robin hood adaptations I've seen so far. The weakest fiction, the most stagnant and boring film ever.Despite two excellent actors, Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, the film has not arrived. Totally waste of time.