Shorts

2009 "Not So TALL Tales From The Director Of 'Spy Kids'"
4.7| 1h29m| PG| en| More Info
Released: 21 August 2009 Released
Producted By: MRC
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A young boy's discovery of a colorful, wish-granting rock causes chaos in the suburban town of Black Falls when jealous kids and scheming adults alike set out to get their hands on it.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

MRC

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Python Hyena Shorts (2009): Dir: Robert Rodriguez / Cast: Jimmy Bennett, James Spader, William H. Macy, Leslie Mann, Kat Dennings: Candy coated crap about the prevail of smaller factors. If one of those smaller factors was the screenwriter then perhaps the screenplay would be above juvenile level. It regards a rainbow coloured stone that ends up in the possession of several people who use it to make wishes into reality. This is never explained and although director Robert Rodriguez showcases his imagination, he never tops his Spy Kids. Perhaps if the screenwriter had gotten his hands on that rock then the screenplay would be Oscar calibre. Jimmy Bennett plays the bullied kid who narrates the film. If he isn't bullied after the release of this film then it is safe to say that he possesses the stone. What is truly sad is the talent that is greatly reduced in this garbage. James Spader plays an evil tycoon in what amounts to one of his worst roles. William H. Macy plays a germ fearing scientist. Perhaps he should be more concerned with dense scripts such as this. Leslie Mann plays Bennett's mother in a role that may make her want to revive her 40 Year Old Virgin role. Speaking of which, another actress from that film that makes a wasted appearance here is Kat Dennings as Bennett's older sister. None of these performances are terribly ambitious, and like the screenplay and special effects it comes up short on magic. Score: 2 / 10
Alan Hathaway I first saw this film a few years ago, and I thought it was pretty good. It was entertaining, kind of funny, and overall a pretty good movie for children. However, not that long ago I came onto IMDb to check what rating it had. Now I wasn't expecting a huge score, maybe a six point something, five at the very worst. But 4.9! That is completely underrating a film that really isn't that bad!There really wasn't too many faults in this film. There was a bit of fantasy, some quirky characters and some pretty good special effects. The plot wasn't some sort of masterpiece, but it was straight forward enough for children to understand, which is good, because it's a children's film. I quite like the way the story was told, how it was narrated from the main character's point of view and how they didn't quite tell it in order. I think one of the reasons why this film was hated so much, is because most of the people who did hate it were adults, and this is a kids movie. For example, lots of the comedy in it would be humorless to adults, but would make kids crack up. But like I said before, this film is meant for young kids, so why does it matter if an adult doesn't find it entertaining?So while this movie isn't any masterpiece, it is still a good film, and one that has been looked down upon. So if you're and adult, maybe you could let this one pass, but for young kids, it's definitely worth a watch. Alan Hathaway
tavm Just watched this movie from 2009 on a single children's matinée showing at 11 am with my movie theatre-working friend. With Robert Rodriguez' name attached, I expected something silly with some good laughs and I did. The title is meant to convey that it's a series of short segments as told by the main kid character in connection with a whole feature that deals with a wish-bearing rock. I think I liked the one about the booger monster the best with second being that bit where Leslie Mann and Jon Cryer as that kid's parents are being literally stuck together. Oh, and I didn't know that this was the first time that Cryer and James Spader had been in the same movie together since Pretty in Pink some 23 years previous. Anyway, I was amused most of the time and wouldn't mind seeing this again with my nieces and nephews. So on that note, Shorts is worth a look if you're in the mood for something imaginative and humorous.
Argemaluco After the atrocious family films Spy Kids 3D : Game Over and The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl, I was not interested in watching Shorts, another independent family film directed by Robert Rodriguez.However, a look at the cast revealed the presence of some competent actors (James Spader, William H. Macy, Leslie Mann and Kat Dennings), so I decided to risk myself and watch this movie.To my huge surprise, Shorts resulted to be an excellent family film which is likable and hugely entertaining, thanks to the skillful performances from the young cast and Rodriguez's irreverent screenplay.At setting the movie on a real environment (instead of the artificial digital universe), Rodriguez did not require of big excesses for telling the story.The special effects look realistic, but they do not loose Rodriguez's characteristic surrealism on them.Shorts may not be his best family movie (I liked the original Spy Kids a bit more), but it is the one which mostly represents the naughty childish imagination, which is funny and innocent but not lacking of some subversion.All the performances from this movie show a lot of energy and enthusiasm, but the movie rests on the shoulders of the childish cast with excellent results.The phenomenal discovery of Jolie Vanier is particularly remarkable.She reminded me thanks to her histrionic force and great presence of Christina Ricci on her juvenile roles.With the exception of Up, Shorts is the best family film I have seen this year.I ended up taking a great surprise with this great family movie, and I recommend it as an excellent option for the whole family.