Star Trek Beyond

2016 "The final frontier...and beyond."
7| 2h2m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 22 July 2016 Released
Producted By: Paramount
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.paramountmovies.com/movies/star-trek-beyond
Synopsis

The USS Enterprise crew explores the furthest reaches of uncharted space, where they encounter a mysterious new enemy who puts them and everything the Federation stands for to the test.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Paramount

Trailers & Images

Reviews

nickboldrini I first reviewed this as a 6. But now on second watch I am giving it an 8. I am not sure why the difference. Except. I am watching this at home a bit drunk on a small screen. And I wonder if the central idea of this film, of being part of a crew, got lost in the big screen spectacle viewing of this first time around. This is an action packed Star Trek film, but it still has the heart of Star Trek - an ensemble piece, where the core crew are ALL heroes, and each play their part to solve the crisis. In this film they all do, and I liked it better second time around, because I think I picked up on that idea, rather than being sucked along on the roller coaster (though I still was). But a big screen overwhelms you with SFX, and spinning cameras ( a key motif of this director). A small screen, shows the core and the flaws, in greater detail, in some ways, because they are not hidden by the spectacle. And I think thats why I liked this more second time round. The heart showed through better.
dangoodpaster Plain and simple...... This is I great combination of what people want today but still being Trek and I mean Trek from the original series.Abrams messed it up over the last two movies, so there are still a couple issues that they didn't think through to keep their, "science" more accurate but it isn't nearly as bad as Into Darkness.The bad guy should've been developed more but here it is...... Like in TOS it has a crazed Captain against Kirk who finally gets to be the hero and.... AND... The others get their time too.I look back at the original Trek movies and they may not be the best but I can watch most all of them over and over again. I can't with the last two but this one I have watched, maybe 10 times. I can't explain it, except that it's the Trek-like story.Not much information in this but that's all I'm saying for now.It gets an 8 because The Undiscovered Country is the best, then Wrath of Kahn, then this.
bandito TEDIOUS. Simon Peg is the writer and star treck Scotty, wrote himself a bigger role the character deserved , and a very boring script for a star treck. Very disappointed . see Wrath of Khan instead.
garth-mailman The original Star Trek was a 3-year TV Series. These big budget extravaganzas cost hundreds of millions as evidenced by the 5 movie studio's logos we have to sit through before the actual movie starts. Most of the action does not take place on the Enterprise the crew's penchant for destroying trillion dollar vessels seeming to continue as does Scotty's ability to get ancient relics back into space. Simon Pegg who plays Montgomery Scott had a hand in writing this one. Kirk, Bones and Spock are the essential trio and we learn of the death of Nimoy both in the script and in a memorial in the credits which also mention Anton on a first name basis only. The ability to survive space exploration does not extend to surviving old age or wonky earth technology. As the saying goes it blows up real good and in the movies sound still manages to travel through space.