TheLittleSongbird Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors. From his Essanay period after leaving Keystone, 'The Bank is not one of his very best but is one of his best early efforts and among the better short films of his. It shows a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay period is something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. Something that can be seen in the more than worthwhile 'The Bank'. The story is still a little flimsy, there are times where it struggles to sustain the short length, and could have had more variety.On the other hand, 'The Bank' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious.While not one of his most hilarious or touching, 'The Bank' is still very funny with some clever, entertaining and well-timed slapstick and is one of his first to have substance and pathos. It moves quickly and there is no dullness in sight. Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet. He also, as usual, gives an amusing and expressive performance and at clear ease with the physicality and substance of the role. The supporting cast acquit themselves well.In summary, very good and one of the best from Chaplin's Essanay period. 8/10 Bethany Cox

JoeytheBrit Chaplin's comic persona still wasn't fully formed when he made this 1915 short for Essanay, but his development was gathering pace and, while there are still dislikeable elements about his character he is not as mean-spirited as he was in his earlier incarnations. Here he plays Charlie the janitor, a lowly worker at a bank who mistakenly believes the pretty teller (played by Edna Purviance) loves him, when she really loves a dapper bank clerk by the same name.Chaplin's comic timing is perfect as always and he makes difficult tricks look easy as he wages war on a fellow worker. Oddly, while the film works a little too hard to tug at the audience's heartstrings, there is no happy ending to this one, and by the final credits the true colours of both Charlie and his love rival are exposed.

CitizenCaine Chaplin edited, wrote, directed, and starred in The Bank, a film about rising above one's station in life and overcoming obstacles. Chaplin was raised in poverty, and because of that, often had himself portray characters victimized by or at odds with the upper classes. Here he plays a janitor in a bank who is frustrated with his lowly status but tries to make do anyway. He has trouble with a fellow janitor, and then he mistakes the secretary's gift for a cashier as being for himself. He sulks away before having a chance to win the secretary again during a bank robbery. Two of the robbers are future film directors: Lloyd Bacon and Wesley Ruggles. The ending seems to suggest to the lower classes that it's OK to have aspirations, but if they aren't achieved, one should be satisfied with one's lot in life. I'm not sure I buy that though. Chaplin, by now, was world famous, and his comedy was becoming more sophisticated and seamlessly integrated into his plots. The Bank tells a simple story with underpinnings of pathos as well as slapstick. **1/2 of 4 stars.

marshallscott-owens The Bank- In an art that isn't completely lost today in big time Hollywood, yet quite possibly hasn't been perfected since, Charlie Chaplin wrote, directed, and starred in his own films. Chaplin shows off his ability to let his actions speak for him. While watching the film it seemed almost as if the music was the dialogue for the movie. Every emotion that Chaplin and the other actors were conveying in the film only seems to be enhanced by the music. Every action by each actor seems as if it is mirrored flawlessly and in sync with the film. No doubt that is the whole concept of silent film; nonetheless it hadn't been completely utilized in cinema during the early part of American film history. The story itself is funny throughout, but still produces emotions from opposite ends of the spectrum. Charlie, the janitor, carries himself with so much pride, as he goes to work, that you are initially under the impression that he is the owner of the bank or the person who runs it. Oddly enough he is nothing more but a janitor and poor janitor at best. His own follies make work harder on him. He doesn't get along with co-workers well and makes bigger messes then he has to clean up. A misunderstanding with another employee over a note to a different Charlie causes him some confusion. Charlie is flattered by the love letter left by the female employee and leaves flowers for her. Then she leaves them behind for Charlie to find. He is hurt by this discovery, so like the good janitor that he is he needs to take a nap while on the job.Suddenly during the middle of his nap he is awoken by robbers trying to steal money from the bank. Charlie, in his clumsy fashion, intends to save the day. He battles his foes displaying a superior boxing talent. He triumphs over his adversaries one at a time, the he saves his lady. A robber almost gets the best of Charlie when his new lady saves him which leads to the discovery of her old man hiding under the desk. Charlie goes in for a heroic victory kiss with his gal, for he had just showed the world he is capable of more than being just a janitor. He is a hero; surely a new promotion at the bank will await him. As the kiss occurs in what seems like the final shot of the movie Charlie finds himself swapping spit with the mop that was by his side during his nap. Charlie is still nothing more than a janitor, and he is still all alone.Throughout the movie you see Charles' ability to showcase comedy. He has an extraordinary talent for making each shot unique with his body movement alone. His writing, editing, and directing all have a profound sharpness to them. The continuity is almost perfect. He shot parts of the film at slower speeds which, when played in real time, make the scene look almost impossible for a human to perform naturally. This technique is something that works best in silent film because there is no sound to manipulate. It is as if Chaplin was able to link real time with sped up motion. This is a directing technique that isn't always possible in modern movies, although it is an old trick. Chaplin was known for never using a working script; this only adds to his creativity and his ability to construct greatness on the fly. The ending surely had to be a twist, a janitor goes from the bottom of the totem pole, to top dog, and in the end you find out that he is nothing more than a janitor once again. Chaplin at one point in his life was a butler, a servant in some ways, much like a janitor. You would think that he would want the little man to come out on top, but Chaplin was also a man who didn't care about riches. Instead of displaying a humorous case of sadism, Chaplin could be showing that people should be happy with what they have. Not that you should settle for less, but as a janitor he in no way showed that he deserved any type of promotion, and sadly enough the only way the janitor could come out on top was in his dreams. To understand The Bank you first have to understand Charles Chaplin. His comedy was more than just humor, was a drive for a better outlook on life. The Bank makes you wonder what the janitor would do to better himself. Maybe making us all ask ourselves the question, how can we better ourselves? With creative shots for the time period and technology you see the genius that Chaplin was and the greatness of the film The Bank.