Michael Bond Even the UN's climate change chief, Rajendra Pachauri ( a man with a vested interest if ever there was one !) has had to acknowledge that until this year (2014) there had been NO rise in global temperature for the last 17 years….a period coinciding with an unprecedented expansion of CO2-emitting Power Stations in China and elsewhere.The evidence in the film "The Great Global Warming Swindle" is that climate has ALWAYS been changing, (for instance, it was much warmer in the Middle Ages than it is now), and that Climate Change is primarily due to processes in the Sun which impact (via the 'solar wind') on cloud-formation, and NOT human activity.CO2, man-made or otherwise, is NOT the driving force behind Climate Change now, and never has been in the past.We can probably all agree that pollution is not a particularly good idea, but on the other hand it is alarmist nonsense to suggest that we are all going to drown under melting ice-caps or something if we continue to burn stuff.The film also has important things to say on the origins of the "theory" of anthropogenic climate change… (think : Reagan and Thatcher)…, and its potential (or rather its AGENDA) to do great harm to economic development in the poorest regions of our planet.

TheBlueHairedLawyer I love pollution and don't care what I do to the environment, and when people see me littering or spraying pesticides, they shout at me and start their hippie lectures, it's highly pathetic and annoying. So I was trying to find a film that explained the other side of the global warming issue, and like this film says...There is no 'global warming issue!' Global warming is a natural cycle, not caused by man but on its own, and this film has the scientific data to back this up. Not only is it informative but it is also not biased the way Al Gore's 'an Inconvenient Truth' was. Decide for yourself which one you'd rather be; uninformed environmentalist hippie fighting for a cause that isn't there, or an educated individual who learns that there are two sides to every story. This is an excellent film and it deserves a 10/10.

raidatlanta We always hear "save the environment" and see a lot of things promoting that message. this covers the other half of the story, or so I thought, it is why I watched it anyways. this while after the movie I was able to contradict, if they did not contradict themselves in the movie, almost everything that was said, or find flaws. without even talking about the information, the movie directing itself does have some minor flaws, for example we see the title about five time at the beginning. the thing is that not only was I able to contradict most of their information, which is formed on a scientific basis, but I don't even study science, I study theatre! My advice would be maybe to watch it if you are curious, but if you are looking for some ACTUAL research information, save you're self some time and skip this feature.

christopher1960 I think this is refreshing to see the other point of view. Much of the press is devoted to one point of view and this represents an attempt at balancing that inequity. Some of the reactions to this movie are attacks upon the accuracy of said movie. Al Gore's statement that the debate is over could not be further from the truth. What is true is that those who contradict his viewpoint do not receive the same degree of publication as do those who support his viewpoint. It is good to hear from those who do not agree and to see what they have to say. It is up to the viewer to decide and investigate further. Much of what the popular press reports seems to be so superficial and lacking in empirical evidence. This report, at least, addresses both theory and evidence even if one camp in the discussion considers it merely "denial." Viewing this movie with the objectivity these individuals say they represent would be a refreshing change.