Ratu Kristina Natakaprabon The thing is, my first intention of watching this movie was to see young DiCaprio for he was my childhood crush. But because it was so difficult to get at the time, then I started to look up about Arthur Rimbaud to know if aside young DiCaprio, it will be interesting to watch. Then boom! I fell madly in love with Rimbaud. He was a very interesting figure to me. He started out as a shy boy who was obedient to every thing his mother told him and ended up as rebel kid who changed the face of literature forever--one of the founding fathers of modern poetry--one of the literary heroes. I forgot my intention to watch young DiCaprio; I watched it to see how Rimbaud's incredible life being portrayed in a movie. I expected this movie to make me drown in tears (I'm very crier when it comes to movies) but no. Instead I was disappointed. Here Rimbaud was portrayed as a stupid brat who can't do better but pissing on another poet from a great height. Total Eclipse is neither a biographical nor art movie. It's a gay movie pretending to be art movie by hiding under the armpits of two brilliant poets. Not that I have problem with gays, but watching this movie will make us wonder why Rimbaud and Verlaine are so important that Hollywood bothers to make a movie about them. Rimbaud and Verlaine before anything else are two of greatest poets in history, but there is no evidence about it here. Here they exaggerate both poets' obnoxiousness. Not even a bit of their genius was shown. There is a funny scene where Rimbaud and Verlaine were in a poet meeting and a poet was "interested" in Rimbaud's poetry but Verlaine butted in and say, "he doesn't like discussing his poetry". Well, the real Rimbaud would be more than happy to discuss his poetry. I wonder if the scriptwriter(s) were too smart to picture about how Rimbaud discussing his poetry with prominent poets in a poet meeting. Another scene: when Rimbaud first arrived in Maute de Fleurville's house, he was very rude and arrogant. In reality, Rimbaud was very shy and nervous that he didn't say a word during dinner until Verlaine "saved" him by taking him into his room. Also, where did the filmmaker(s) get the "fact" that Rimbaud encouraging Verlaine to shoot him by swaying his hand in the air like an asshole? There are still other inaccurate scenes but I chose not to talk about it further. It made me laugh to read there is someone here who wrote that after watching this movie he refused to read anything from Rimbaud anymore. Lol, I doubt he even read Rimbaud. There is also someone who wrote that with the kind of behavior that she saw in this movie, Rimbaud deserves to be forgotten. Judging someone so legendary based on a movie that didn't even receive good reviews shows how shallow you are as a person. If you can't judge a book by its movie, you can't judge a public figure by its movie either. Better read his biography. From Graham Robb I will suggest the most. Of course it's a very long biography for people who dislike reading and prefer to judge a literary hero by a silly movie who was banned from the theaters not even a week after its release. But for those who don't mind reading hundreds pages of book, this biography by Graham Robb will help you to know why Rimbaud is so important. Anyways, Rimbaud and Verlaine created one of the greatest love stories. Total Eclipse actually has some good scenes regarding this affair, the problem is when I watch this movie from the start to ending I will be nothing but annoyed. Those scenes can be good only if I watch them alone, you know, without having to watch the movie in a whole. Why I didn't rate it lower? The answer is somehow I still owe this movie because I discovered Rimbaud for the first time from it. And I appreciate both DiCaprio's and Thewlis performance for Rimbaud and Verlaine are very difficult role to play.

Miss Naughtia This story takes place in the 19th century where two French male poets, Verlaine and Rimbaud, start a taboo like love affair.Verlaine is recently married and Rimbaud is much younger and still single. They're both very passionate and talented, and the heated love affair between them soon creates a lot of trouble.The first thing that came to my mind was that it was extremely weird watching DiCaprio acting as a homosexual and even weirder watching him making a homosexual love scene. It must've taken a lot of bravery from DiCaprio playing a part like this one.The movie was just OK but not something I would want to watch once more. The greatest thing about this movie was of course Leonardo DiCaprio.

tangoviudo Few biopics of great artists have ever worked. This one was perhaps doomed from the start - dealing as it so valiant tries with one of the great enigmas of French poetry, Arthur Rimbaud. I suppose the director deserves credit for even attempting the impossible. She deserved far far better than Leo DiCaprio as Arthur Rimbaud. It would be kind to say he was miscast. He wasn't. He simply cannot act.Everyone else in the cast is excellent - even David Thewlis as Paul Verlaine. Romaine Bohringer is beyond reproach (especially in her nude scenes) as Verlaine's long-suffering wife (weren't they all long-suffering?).Rimbaud remains a total mystery, quite particularly because of this sad film.

Lee Eisenberg In this very grim portrayal of the love affair between 19th century French poets Arthur Rimbaud (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Paul Verlaine (David Thewlis), we see how they in fact had a mutually destructive relationship. The movie really makes you feel like you're rubbing your face against sandpaper. You're not sure whether you want to sympathize with Rimbaud or find him unpleasant, but Verlaine is a real creep, often abusing his wife.Overall, this isn't a great movie, but worth seeing. If nothing else, it's a look at a certain part of literary history, but also of the most despicable kind of relationship possible. So if you do plan to see it, just be forewarned that it will probably make your stomach turn.