earnesttravis7 Brilliant...Remarkable indie film...I stumbled upon this film by pure accident and was not expecting it to be such a great film...A very well told story that help my attention...Much better than the run-of-the-mill Hollywood blockbuster...Thumbs up to this first time screenwriter...Would love to see more of your work...This is a must see for any movie buffs...You will really enjoy how this great tale ends...Awesome!!!

a_baron A Harvard graduate who is nothing short of a genius decides the best way to impress the woman of his dreams is to kidnap her. That's what he learned from an Ivy League education? Apparently. However, the lady concerned is having none of it. She would have been justified in killing him, but after striking him with that golf club once, foolishly made for the door. Had she landed a few more blows she could have incapacitated him and tied him up. There are many missed opportunities like this, but the plot is even more implausible than it is silly, and the two twists at the end, well, the first is even less credible.Granted this was made on a low budget, but as psychological dramas go, it is not. Still, at least there was no rape scene, although by the time he does get her into bed, most juries would agree that some sort of Stockholm syndrome was afoot, convict him of that as well as kidnapping, and throw away the key.

Joseph_Halsey Spoilers ahead. As far as I'm concerned, some of the ratings may have been submitted by those who have a vested interest. For me, the film was a slow, nerve- grating, disgusting depiction of Stockholm Syndrome and nothing more. Also,there were too many contrivances (or the girl was just plain stupid): a) She could have hit him repeatedly with the golf club, killing him. b) There were several items, other than her bare hands, with which she could have tried to jimmy the boards covering the windows. She could have smashed a chair and used one of its legs; and ditto for the fan- stand. Plus, there appeared to have been a cinder-block handy. c) She could have smashed him over the head with the bottle instead of going for his keys. Not to mention that consuming alcohol in the first place was a mistake on her part. d) She cooperated with him too often. On the other hand, if she had pretended to cooperate from the start, she could probably have had more chances to catch him off guard. e) It wasn't explained how he got her into the tub, clothes or no clothes. The final scene was tacked on in order to shock us but is actually redundant. We know he's a sicko.

superherosquebecois I was searching for trailers on the web for the "Fifty shades of Grey" book series and I landed on a trailer for the indie flick "Twisted Seduction". It got my interest within the first few seconds of the trailer because it dealt with the same general subject matter / erotic thriller / submissive-dominant tone.So I Googled it to find out where I could watch the film and found it in a free streaming form, on the official movie site.I started with low expectations, since there was a message from the director at the beginning, stating that they made the film with $30K of their own money.The first 15 minutes were a bit slow and creepy, but I quickly started to be deeply invested in the characters. I was soon loving every minute of it. The director was a master at building a deep connection between the characters and the audience.Towards the end, the movie had already exceeded my expectations and delivered fully, but it came back with a double twist and left me completely surprised. It is THE best independent movie I've seen my entire life. The ending is simply UNGUESSABLE. TWO THUMS UP!