Vampires: Out For Blood

2004 "It takes one to kill one."
Vampires: Out For Blood
4.1| 1h35m| en| More Info
Released: 31 July 2004 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

In the dark, throbbing world of underground raves, people are vanishing without a trace and Detective Hank Holten is the only one who knows the terrible truth. Vampires.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Trailers & Images

Reviews

HumanoidOfFlesh An LAPD detective Hank Holten goes searching for a missing college girl and discovers that she has joined a commune of bloodsuckers lurking in the Los Angeles underground."Out for Blood" is as awful as the modern vampire flicks get.The concept has been done to death,our protagonist gets bitten by a vampire after visiting a rave and he is slowly transforming into vampire.There is a bit of gore including quick decapitation and the tongue bitten off by vampire,but the film is absolutely predictable with no suspense or scares.The acting is weak and the make-up of the vampires is hilarious.If you enjoyed "Dracula II:Ascension" or similar nonsensical vampire crap you may try it.I still think that watching paint dry is far more interesting than suffering through this garbage.2 out of 10 and that's being generous.
Christopher Smith I watched OUT FOR BLOOD when it premiered on the Sci-Fi channel last summer and although I was expecting it to be slightly better than it was, I still found it to be better than most movies that premiered on the Sci-Fi channel in the past few years. Low-budget like all of the Sci-fi channel original movies, some of the effects are a bit cheesy, but most of them are decent enough. One would expect the special effects to be the highlight of a vampire film like this, but the highlight is actually Kevin Dillon's performance. His performance almost makes up for the clichéd script and occasionally weak directing. Despite the flaws of OUT FOR BLOOD, it still an entertaining picture that never left me bored and given a better budget and script, could have been an above average vampire flick. I give it 5/10.
bobjohnson994 Congratulations, this is the movie that irritated me enough to write my first IMDb comment.I am a FAN of stupid vampire movies, but this one is TOO STUPID. This one is in the "don't even bother to rent" category.Example: You are a master vampire, alive for 700 years. The word "gullible" does not come to mind to describe you. Yet, you manage to carry on a 5 minute duologue with the heroes after they have slaughtered your whole brood, while having a crossbow pointed at your chest. Even though you have the power to rip off both their heads within seconds, you try the persuasion route, empathic demon that you are.Nigerian Puuuleeeze.
jlamb-1 I would like to know who I contact at Sci Fi to request a refund of the 2 hours of my life wasted on this movie. It was a hodge-podge of every known vampire movie cliché known to man... Have to kill the master... darn its almost sundown.. Why don't they ever find him 5 minutes after 9 am?I gotta look under the bed...ooops I'm dead.The one good point in this movie (besides the end.. not the ending but the words THE END) was the Sammy Sosa impression done to the ex-wife's boyfriend. ClassyIf anyone else hasn't seen this flick.. I envy you.