nickrbarretta Iron Man 2 was good. The beginning with Tony at the convention in the suit was a good part and when Whiplash was developing his weapons were both great scenes. When Tony was driving the race car and then had the battle with Whiplash I thought was good, and when Hammer took him in to help take down Tony was also interesting. When Hammer and Whiplash were having the side plot with the bird, though, I thought was stupid and unnessisary. What I did find interesting was when Rhoads took the other Iron Man suit and became War Machine and then fought Iron Man, I genuinely thought that was a great scene. But then the fight when Iron Man and War Machine we're back to back fighting of the bad guys was a good scene, but it seemed to be almost the exact same as Iron Man 1. But the fight with Whiplash was very forgettable. Overall, a decent film.

yaxleycratler Iron Man 2 wasn't bad it just wasn't as good as the first. They set everything up nicely as Whiplash being the main villain and I loved the raceway scene. But then he was taken away for the middle of the movie and Justin Hammer became the main focus despite Whiplash being much cooler. Black Widow was introduced but she was pretty much useless until the end when they need it. The raceway scene was very cool and then they started taking useless scenes and putting them together just to add time to the movie, but luckily tge ending was good. I like Don Cheadle as War Machine thiugh, so that's a plus.

pokerface14 I'll never understand why people didn't like this instalment in the MCU. RDJ returns for the role he was born for, we are introduced to the kickass Black Widow, and Mickey Rourke plays a pretty cool villain. Yes, the plot is pretty jam-packed with a lot of different side-plots which can get confusing, but I'd say this a sequel almost as good as the original. Rating: 8/10

AHOLDER-1 Sound: Well mixed, sound effects well done. Great use of pop tunes in sound track as orchestral and environmental music. 90/100 Technical: Excellent special effects and well shot. 100/100 Narrative: A little light on the action for this genre. It does not move as fast as it should and does not arc as much as it should. 70/100 Character/Acting: Acting mostly middle of the road. The characters are not as strong this time. The villains not menacing or treacherous. 60/100 Did I like it: Yes, a fun film and very enjoyable. 70/100 Artistic merit: A well crafted film but lacks the notoriety, upper crust performances, or narrative to be considered seriously here. There are better examples of super hero movies to fill that role (The Dark Knight). 60/100 Total score 75/100