Wild Seven

2006 "No Plan is perfect"
Wild Seven
3.9| 1h38m| R| en| More Info
Released: 01 January 2006 Released
Producted By: Beat Pirate Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

In this darkly karmic vision of Arizona, a man who breathes nothing but ill will begins a noxious domino effect as quickly as an uncontrollable virus kills. As he exits Arizona State Penn after twenty-one long years, Wilson has only one thing on the brain, leveling the score with career criminal, Mackey Willis. As eccentric and intuitive as he is vicious, Mackey's own perfected criminal game will play right into the path Wilson has set for him. With the help of a prison bus driver, Lee Marvin, Wilson acts as a catalyst, putting a plan into action that will bring an untimely end to Mackey Willis. The problem is, nothing goes exactly as planned.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Beat Pirate Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Kekburlol If i could describe the film in short it would be: A bad scripted and poorly executed film, from an unimaginative Tarentino fan, who made choices in the film based on what 'looked cool' leaving behind a confusing and unbelievable affair that lacked any substance.This is the long winded way in which i describe the film.A large part of the films script was terrible, truly terrible followed by some even worse directing. Some Technical aspects of the film like the intro were far too long.. and the scenes in which they played harmonious music followed by time lapse recording of clouds seemed very out of place.The driving intro almost made me want to switch off the film from the start. Determined to give it a chance, the next part cut to the bank robbery scene (Tarentino end at the beginning style) it gave some lick of promise, so i continued watching.The biggest problem i had with the film was the actions of the characters themselves the relationship of the young guys was unbelievable, seemed like very forced company. Secondly their behaviour itself wasn't believable. Not a single person in this film would of agreed to rob the bank with the reasons given if you look at the type of person they are, and situation they are in. The whole 'intricate' revenge scheme which really wasn't sophisticated at all seemed unnecessary.. according to the script the main character gave money to his wife from the original robbery and didn't appear to need the money that bad at all, especially looking at their home.The idea of the film itself isn't bad but 99% of the film probably would need to be changed to make it work. The ending itself was poorly executed - create your own ending type of film but didn't give enough ending for people to come up with anything credible or to even care to think it up.I am all for independent films but this is a poorly executed and badly scripted film from someone who probably got straight c's in film school because he 'enjoyed' making films and loved Tarentino.. but never really got the concept of what makes a movie great.
barkbarkwoof Unfortunately I managed to read the good reviews of this movies and it looked like a gem. There are basically three story lines one of which comes and goes with no rhyme or reason. The other two are centered around revenge and come together sloppily.Other than that there are good actors in bad roles and bad actors in nonsensical roles. You have to ask why certain characters are even in the movie. One character has troubles seeming like he stole something. He's killed and the situation and his murder has nothing to do with the rest of the movie. It not only doesn't influence the main plot or any other characters, they don't even know anything about it. They think he's just sleeping one off.I hate to spoil it but it ends abruptly like so many films (and the Sopranos) seem to do today. Leaving the viewer to ask "WTF did I just watch?"
clonedhuman ....that's the impression I had of this movie.It was genuinely awful. For all its edgy posing, the hackneyed dialogue, the poor acting from the twenty-somethings, the plot line that somehow managed to be overly convoluted and boringly simplistic at the same time, and the flat one-dimensional characters made this movie seem like torture by blandness.When I wasn't injecting my own MST3K commentary, I was wondering how anyone could possibly have funded this movie - and I imagined that the fathers of the actors/director were all oil billionaires or something.It's part of the culture of entitlement with the twenty-something offspring of wealthy parents - if you want to make a movie, you can do it! If you want to record a rap album, you can do it! You're great! Here's the problem: Somewhere along the way people seem to have forgotten that creating great art requires talent and imagination. Hell, creating mediocre art requires some talent and imagination. Creating a movie like Wild 7 only requires Daddy Warbucks and an unearned sense of self-confidence fostered by overly-indulgent parents and a true lack of understanding about what makes great movies great.In short ... we all love movies. But, that doesn't me we all can make them. Sometimes you're only cut out to be a fan.
corpseed This is perhaps one of the worst films I've had the misfortune to see all year. Tarantino knockoffs are a dime a dozen but this is truly scraping the bottom of the barrel. Decent performances from b-movie stalwarts Loggia and Forster are quickly overshadowed by hackneyed, clichéd dialog from a writer/director who clearly has no vision or talent. The film is paced with very pretty time lapse photography of the Arizona dessert which I imagine is supposed to invoke some kind of looming dread but instead comes off as some cloying device to extend the duration of the film. The abrupt ending is some attempt at a clever twist but ends up leaving the viewer with the bitter realization that they have wasted the past 90 minutes. I'm astonished that this film is rated so highly on this website.