mcintiretracey I have been a volunteer living historian at Antietam National Battlefield for over 5 years. I personally know most of the historians that were interviewed for the Antietam episode. Their segments are great. The rest of the production is a historical disgrace. Others have gone into detail about the many inaccuracies, so I won't cover those in this review. What I will say is that those inaccuracies are not the result of a low budget, but rather laziness or downright willful ignorance. It doesn't cost money to look at period photos and drill manuals on the Internet and see what your soldiers should look like and how they should handle a rifle and a cannon. The lack of research for the battle scenes in this production is a disgrace and it is a slap in the face to the historians that were interviewed and to the soldiers who fought and died at Antietam. Shame on you, AHC. You are disrespecting the American Heroes you claim to care so much about.

awl7788 I'm no historian, but I love history and especially civil war history. My love of civil war history stems from my relation to Gen. "Stonewall" Jackson. I have visited many battlefields at Gettysburg, Chickamauga, Lookout Mt., Signal Mt., Shilo, etc... and have attended a few reenactments and have been to MANY museums about the war featuring uniforms and guns. Like the other reviews ( which might be the same person because the main complaint was uniform inaccuracies. The uniforms are bad, yes, the acting really bad, yes... My expectations weren't extremely high, though, because it is very low budget. My main complaint is how unbelievably inaccurate and misconstrued the actual history is. I could lay all of them out from the first 20 minutes, but you wouldn't want to read all of them. One example - this documentary makes it seem as if the southern states had seceded out of fear of Abe abolishing slavery! Not only was abolishing slavery among the first things the confederacy was going to do after the war, but Abe wanted to send every African American to Panama! You've got to show every side of the secession because non of it is cut and dry. How would you like to be taxed "exporting" goods to your own country because you lived and worked in the south? Study up on state inequalities as the country grew to understand more fully what was going on. Slavery was NOT an issue at the beginning of the war, but was turned into THE cause the union soldiers were given to boost morale because they were being slaughtered and were giving up! The confederate soldiers nor their generals were villains, but land owners protecting their property and families. This documentary implies the south was going to invade the north, but Abe from the beginning wanted to quickly squash, through war, the rebelling states and restore the union by force. General Lee was even visited personally by Abe and was asked to lead the army of the union, but Lee declined saying he never thought his country would invade itself and his duty was to his home and his state- not because he wanted to save the institution of slavery. The civil war is very complicated and not cut and dry like this documentary portrays. In fact, the south had blacks fighting in their ranks. I have an adopted black brother who is even more a history buff than I and has even participated in reenactments as a confederate. When he arrived the historians were beside themselves telling him his knowledge of the war exceeded some of their peers who some just didn't know, but even those who deliberately leave those details out because it taints the history they want to show. He even dressed as a confederate to tour Gettysburg and was met with tons of compliments from experts and fellow reenactment participants. I really wanted to enjoy this show because I'm always trying to watch civil war documentaries when they're available. Here's my suggestion. If you want to learn about our civil war, go on a trip and visit museums and battlefields when you can. If you can't, watch the most historically accurate films ever made in Gettysburg and Gods and Generals. The books these films are based on are even better. If you read this far into this review, thanks. My parting words- visit the sites as the truth is preserved in most cases and don't watch this show.

siltmanf These people have wasted a great opportunity to educate people on the realities of the Civil War, but their depiction of warfare and the soldiers is utterly terrible. Did you hire historical/technical advisors for the battle scenes? If so, who? They should be fired. More likely, you didn't. There is no excuse the historical inaccuracies portrayed and does a disservice to the men you are portraying. There are too many material culture and historical experts on the Civil War to do this so poorly and not even remotely depict the appearance, conduct or nature of the common soldier, and to not even depict warfare as it was. The battle scenes are nothing short of disgraceful.

Caleb Avery The show lacks the proper representation of civil war battles. The soldiers seem to move like they're in some sort of Vietnam movie drama. There is no proper representation of civil war tactics. The civil war "uniforms" if you can call them such, are also terrible, deplorable even. They're not even close to looking like civil war soldiers. Was there even a historical consultant to work on the production? The acting is just a bad. The acting was similar to that of a low cost production high school class feature film. There was no consideration for the men who went through that conflict. It made the war look like a bunch of children playing soldier.