billjohnso I grew up in the woods Alabama. I've seen my share of things that were not supposed to exist from Mountain Lions to Bigfoot. My encounter was 20 years ago and I saw the creature 30 yards away. As such, I was excited when Finding Bigfoot first came on TV.With the show's advent, I thought that we would finally get indisputable proof these creatures exist. Disappointed, I stopped watching the show after the 2nd or 3rd season. Why? It wasn't because they didn't find one. It's because they are all IDIOTS!!! As a hunter, one does not go into the woods to find animals blaring recordings of supposed howls, hitting trees with bats, playing Bigfoot movies using trees as a movie screen, shooting fireworks off, throwing loud beer parties, taking baboons into the woods, etc.! To find the game one is after, a hunter enters the woods with as little disruption and noise as possible. It does not matter if it is a deer or a Bigfoot! The sole reason I saw the one in my encounter was because I was deer hunting and the thing did not know I was in the area because I was being QUIET!!! Ask any hunter who has seen one and they will all tell you about daylight sightings that occurred while the hunter was being as silent as possible in the hope of coming across whatever game animal he or she was hunting! Just as one will catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, one will have a greater chance at actually "finding" Bigfoot if they use stealth instead of pretending to be a bulldozer! I for one am thrilled to know Finding Bigfoot is cancelled. I am sick of those idiots making those who have had legitimate encounters look like fools by association. There are a lot of genuine researchers out there who have actually seen a great deal more in one night than Matt Moneymaker has seen in his entire life. Why? The other guys aren't IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ryan Stoltz "Finding Bigfoot" follows 4 members of the BFRO (Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization) in their search of prime evidence that "Bigfoots" exist. In a typically episode they have a couple night investigations, a town hall meeting followed up by viewing the sites of some of the sightings mentioned at the town hall, and some extra shots.I love it how they "lure in" a Sasquatch. Most of the time they do calls/howls, but often they'll do "wood knocks". If they get a response, a thermal camera may capture a hot spot.I disagree with the other reviews; the "Squatchers" (the amount of times they incorporate the word 'squatch' in their talking makes me have a good laugh) aren't kid-like buffoons that'll think any shadow is a mythical creature; they're actually quite realistic, especially Ranae. A good 75% of what they find they put aside as some other animal, or fake.Sure, sometimes they might think a blot on the thermal camera is something else then it obviously is, but in my opinion that only makes the show better.People expect too much of the show; they're searching for a mythical creature that has no real evidence of existence. And yet the bad reviewers expect there to be hard evidence in every episode. In the last episode I watched there were no responses or sightings, and yet it was still satisfying.One other thing that makes the show better is the cheesy cliffhangers; there will be a signature on the thermal camera, or a sound in the distance, and then it will cut to commercial, but not before their classic intro/outro of an bigfoot screaming. These are always a funny addition.But don't get me wrong, I don't watch the show for laughs; some aspects may be funny, but the hunt of a mythical creature is what makes the show special.

okruss I have been watching this show since the beginning and it's getting worse. During the most recent season they went Squatch hunting on snowy nights, rainy nights and windy nights. They heard very few "squatch" noises and found nothing (as usual). And of course the weather was to blame. You'd think they would check the weather report before planning a trip. Amateurs all the way. Matt has been "researching Sasquatches for 25 years" and counting, yet he has no definitive proof of their existence. and neither does anyone else! Ranae is the only team member who has any real common sense. Has anyone noticed that whenever they think they hear something, someone inevitable says, "DID YOU HEAR THAT?!! Yeah, well any animals that were around heard you say, "DID YOU HEAR THAT! That's why the "research team" hardly ever gets a second response. They talk too much and too loudly. I have finally come to my senses and will not watch this farce any longer. It's just a money-making vehicle for Animal Planet and Matt MONEYMAKER. Get it? Moneymaker....

anhrcs Renee what is wrong with you? this is the only reason that my family hesitates to watch this show! What does a Sasquatch have to do, bite you in your butt? If the producers think that they need someone like you who refuses to believe the obvious, then they are mistaken!It only makes the reviews of the show much worse! What will it take for you to see the truth. These honest people come forward with true stories, photos and recordings. Why do you make them look like idiots? All that this does is to make the show look so dishonest by placing negative Nancy in the show. It is so fake because no one can be that ignorant! Well, I guess the show wants you to see a Sasquatch face to face so you will finally believe. No way, they are much smarter!