Abduction

2009 "A nice place to visit, but you wouldn't want to die there"
Abduction
3| 1h48m| en| More Info
Released: 01 August 2009 Released
Producted By: Orrichio Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

ABDUCTION: The town of Process is located somewhere in rural New Jersey. It's been in existence for over 100 years, although it's not on any known map. It's a nice place to visit, with lovely shops and friendly people. That is unless you are single, young, healthy and good looking! It's even worse if you are a female of childbearing age. The town has a very lucrative underground and Internet business specializing in selling human organs for transplant, selling babies to loving couples who are barren and auctioning young women into sex slavery.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Orrichio Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

shipdit002 ... but all you would need is the DVD box for that, right? I bought my copy on eBay; five bucks down the drain! Thank you to the seller who gave me free shipping. My questions: Did the director read the script? WAS there a script? Was the editor on hallucinogenics while working? Is John Orrichio someone who inherited $100,000 and spent at least half of it asking people in his neighborhood if they wanted to be in a movie? Does he have another relative with a failing breast augmentation clinic who offered to get him laid in return for some free advertising? Was that surgeon on the same hallucinogenics as the editor? "Rocky Horror" was a low-budget classic. What is the opposite of classic? This is it.
krish-4 OK .. watched this on netflix last night - so did not have to spend extra money on this junk.Made with little budget and devoid of any production value, the movie goes on for a little under two hours, often without purpose and always with poor acting. In fact the acting is so bad, that it is worse than a porn movie.The director tried to spice things up with some T&A. But the scenes had no real sex appeal as the women's faces were mostly covered in a hood. Actually not sure if the hood thing was a blessing in disguise. Most of the women who showed skin in this flick were by and large unattractive. An earlier review mentioned that this is John Orrichio's best film. That may very well be. But that speaks volumes of John Orrichio's other efforts.
AtomicFirestorm Problem: You're a relatively ugly looking guy, and you want to see some large breasted, but rather homely otherwise, women topless. But when you ask, they just laugh at you.Solution: Buy a digital camera, and get a few of your plain friends and make a "movie" and invite these solidly average women with large breasts, I mean on a scale of 1 to 10 these "actresses" are a 6 at best even with artificial tits, to "star" in it.And the result is this film. I give it a zero for acting, but added 1 point for having the balls to release what is obviously a scam targeted at desperate women trying to "make it" in the movies well beyond their prime. I also added another point for the tits. But I subtracted that point again, since the tits were AWFUL. Whoever did the boob-jobs on these women (grandmothers?) should have their license revoked.
briansawesome I watched a part of this movie on Netflix instant watch. I actually enjoy the genre of cheesy horror films many of which I can easily sit through. Why would anyone agree to distribute this movie? I'm convinced that this is a porn production companies weak attempt at making a soft-core/horror movie. Questions for the writer/producer: Why were all the girls dressed like prostitutes BEFORE they are abducted? Is there a reason you shaved off girls eyebrows and painted them back on? Why did you waste so much time on a convincing cover and not enough time on writing/producing the movie? ...anyway this might be worth a watch, just make sure you are taking notes on how NOT to make a movie.