Adam & Steve

2005 "A tempting new comedy"
Adam & Steve
5.8| 1h39m| R| en| More Info
Released: 24 April 2005 Released
Producted By: Funny Boy Films
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Adam and Steve are two gay youths who have a one-night stand that ends embarrassingly. Nearly two decades later, Adam, now a Manhattan tour guide, and Steve, a psychiatrist, meet again -- but neither remembers the other from years before. The two begin dating, even playing matchmaker for their friends Michael and Rhonda, but their promising relationship hits a major snag when Adam and Steve finally recall their past connection.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Funny Boy Films

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Arlis Fuson A man rushes his dog to a hospital instead of a vet after he accidentally stabs it. A nice doctor there helps him out and fixes the dog up. Sometime later they run across each other again and fall for each other. The adventure then begins of them falling in love, dealing with homophobia from a crazy neighbor as well as Jersey bottle throwers. They have to deal with each others crazy best friends, weird parents and soon they must deal with the fact they had met years before under very embarrassing conditions.The first time I watched this movie it made me laugh, but didn't do much for me, but here on my second viewing I laughed harder and seemed to accept it greatly. It has some very funny parts and is downright charming. I loved the clichés and the characters here. From the embarrassing "hershey squirts" to the OCD shower scene where the man washes the young boy before having sex with. Gay line dancing with a drag queen singing 'sh*t happens' and the very unlucky family of the guy that seem to have disaster follow them everywhere they go. It was funny and well worth a watch, gay or straight.Tripple the talent here for Craig Chester who wrote a beautiful story, directed it nicely and stars here in perhaps his best role. Other major players were Parker Posey and Julie Haggarty. Chris Kattan had a big part here, and he was one of my few faults as he is a tad annoying.Funny enough and charming enough for 4/10 stars. I liked it and could gladly watch it again.
Boyd Petrie It seems exceptionally difficult to make a gay romance (or any gay-themed film, it seems) without delving into cheap stereotypes. There have been a few diamonds in the rough, but Adam & Steve is a painfully unfunny and extremely dull film that is neither romantic nor comedic. Aside from the throwaway sight gags, the poor directing, the mediocre acting, the spectacularly awful writing, Adam & Steve's real problem is its tonal shifts. The mish-mash of genres here keeps adding barrier after barrier to push the audience out of the picture. The film begins with an odd introduction of the main characters, complete with Parker Posey in a fat suit. Next up, we get two visual sight gags of poop and vomit in one scene (one of which is so poorly done, I laughed in spite of how unfunny it was).There are scenes of drama, there are scenes of comedy, there are scenes of musical numbers and a choreographed dance sequence. It only takes about 15 minutes to realize how bad this picture really is. Parker Posey and Chris Kattan, along with a handful of supporting character actors, upstage the two main leads who are about as charismatic as two rocks. There are scenes where Posey and Kattan both seem to be rolling their eyes, maybe wondering how they got roped into this production.Adam & Steve has no direction and flounders in search of one. It jumps all over the place, going from a completely screwball gross-out comedy (attempting a pale imitation of the Farrelly Brothers) to a tender love story (admittedly neither tender nor particularly loving... not even really a story for that matter). It almost seems as if the screenplay were written in segments and then spliced together. There are a handful of humorous moments, most of which come courtesy of Posey and Kattan, that prevent the movie from becoming a complete waste of time. And the final climactic moments are nicely handled, a welcome break from the maddening confusion that has preceded it all. The only reason to see this one is if you are a fan of either Posey or Kattan. And, really, if you are, both have done far superior work.
philip-1 My summary pretty much says it all. I hate to ponder all the glowing reviews of this travesty at IMDb which would lead me to believe that my fellow gay audience must be so starved for entertainment, that they would praise a mess like this.Let's go through the list of what's wrong with this movie.Firstly, it has a terrible script. The jokes fall flat everywhere, the characters are cardboard, and there isn't a single sympathetic character to be found in the whole movie. I love that some people have found it "realistic". Believe me, there aren't any people that resemble the idiots and misfits in this film; gay people, straight people, parents; you name it. They are mostly all unattractive, hapless people that you don't want to spend 90 minutes with.Secondly, the movie is horribly miscast. Craig Chester is not a good director regardless of the budget. He shouldn't have cast himself in the lead; he hasn't a wit of charm. Why Steve would want this guy is a complete mystery. George Bush has more personality. I always worry how much of an ego trip is really involved in someone writing, directing and staring in a movie. With results like this, it should be a criminal offense. The other actors are equally bad. Mr. Chester and Mr. Gets are so bad in the movie's first scenes, you know they won't get any better later on. Parker Posey looks bored with the whole project. Adam's parents and sister can't act; neither can Steve's; his mother looks the same age as he does. The straight room mate of Steve is a miserable actor. Where did they find these people and how did they survive Chester's direction??? Thirdly, the movie is badly edited. At least half of it should have gone on the cutting room floor. Some of the scenes are so bad I was talking back to my TV screen in a sarcastic manner. Why does the dog have to get stabbed??? Why does Parker Posy have to do three or four really annoying stand up routines??? The two step scene at the end would have worked in a more clever movie, but in this one it just seems like an appendage.I was glad to send this one back to Netflix never to be seen by me again. What is truly appalling is how many people enjoyed this misguided attempt at comedy. It really tells me that we are really getting stupid in this country.
arizona-philm-phan Craig Chester and Malcolm Gets (particularly this latter hunk, who's just so winsomely huggable---he seems so right at home, so comfortable with himself) have some real warm moments, and that doesn't often happen in gay-themed films these days. Unfortunately the pluses of this are more than a few times imbalanced by some of the following minuses: -An overage of what other review sites have called "gross-out" humor. I easily could have stood the early on diarrhea sight-gag, had its use not been later overloaded by the sometimes diarrhetic mouth of a stand-up club's master of ceremonies (Michael Panes, was it?) and of Parker Posey's character, herself, upon occasion. Why are such remarks, like the female-bestiality cracks in "The 40 Year Old Virgin" considered such fair game in humor these days? Puke!!-Perhaps a little over-reliance on Jewish "sensibility-moments."-Guess, overall, I just feel that Chester has been around long enough to: know better, turn out something better, just plain old be better. It can't have been inexpensive to roll out this product, so it just seems he could'a gotten a lot more for his buck (and we for ours).WHOA.....WHOA......WHOA.........STOPPpppp! You know what? I went back and "re-looked" this movie last night, and in the midst of my millionth laugh, it suddenly hit me that I hadn't really laughed any less the first night. Say, maybe I've been trying to make something too serious out of this little production, and that's not what it's about at all. It really doesn't have to be another "Brokeback Mountain" (as great as that was). Isn't it nice, instead, to have something that keeps our spirits up? Well, you bet.And we can have all the "sensibility-moments" they can throw at us......cause isn't there a good, old Hebrew word that just perfectly describes Adam? Isn't it something like.......Klutz (and a lovable one at that)? And being "sad-sacky," that can be funny too, can't it? Right on!Finally, on an even more positive note (for someone like me who's always placing gay kissing scenes*** under the old microscope), I'd have to judge that this production has not been afraid to give us a goodly number of 'osculating-lips-in-action' shots. Don't you agree? They weren't all perfectly aimed, but there were some really good ones.PS--So, congratulations, Adam & Steve, on your wedding and for being able to live in a world far removed from that of Jack & Ennis.***And for scenes in which "lip-locks" were done as well or better, try these: "Just A Question Of Love" / "Latter Days" / "All Over The Guy" / "Brokeback Mountain" / "Maurice" / sorry, gotta stop somewhere)