Ancient Aliens Debunked

2012
Ancient Aliens Debunked
6.9| 3h11m| en| More Info
Released: 27 September 2012 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://ancientaliensdebunked.com/
Synopsis

Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the "ancient astronaut theory" which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others. The film covers topics like: Ancient building sites: Puma Punku, The Pyramids, Baalbek, Incan sites, And Easter Island. Ancient artifacts: Pacal's rocket, the Nazca lines, the Tolima "fighter jets", the Egyptian "light bulb", Ufo's in ancient art, and the crystal skulls. Ancient text issues: Ezekiel's wheel, Ancient nuclear warfare, Vimana's, the Anunnaki, and the Nephilim.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Trailers & Images

Reviews

tbolli Excellent i've been watching aliens for a number of years and often found their facts disturbingly easy to debunk with my own limited knowledge, what this documentary has done was to fill in a lot of the blanks left open by the series own so called experts. What an absolute sham This show is , and the "experts" nothing more then snake oil salesman!! The history channel does a disservice to its audience by promoting such farcical nonsense , TMBolli a former fan of the history channel,
Maurie Hartman This is an incredibly thorough analysis of the History Channels productions about Ancient Aliens one might find.The 190 minutes cover many of the "Ancient Aliens" claims, literally one after the other, explaining the scientific and technical faults and distortions, so much so that it appears that the "Ancient Aliens" claims are beyond lack of understanding, becoming so laughable than it appears that many claims are outright lies to support their presuppositions! This clearly makes the "Ancient Aliens" productions by the History Channel a laughable menagerie of silliness. A true embarrassment to the credibility of the History Channel!
intrepidami To so methodically research and debunk many, many claims by Ancient Aliens and accuse them constantly of bait and switch, and leaps of faith and then spoil it all by throwing in his own debunked tenant belief that ancient Hebrew texts were meticulously handed down perfectly replicated, by offering one example as concrete proof? Don't you realize what you did there? It's their own contention that many of their thoughts, and theories might be wrong, but they just have to be right once to prove their whole point.You did the same thing! You need to go read Bart Ehrmans books on the MYTH that the Bible scrolls were handed down perfectly unaltered son. With over 10,000 known historic alterations/edits/changes before even being translated to paper! Nowadays practically every word has been substituted for another in somebodies translation, but those ancient scribes did plenty of edits themselves! I understand why you believe it, it's been a constant teaching in Christian fundamentalism that the Perfect Bible got handed down perfectly forever, but its just not true and been completely debunked.Shattered glass house.
Yggdrasil Ancient Aliens Debunked is for the most part a proper step-by-step debunking. The 'Ancient Aliens' History Channel show makes many ridiculous claims which are carefully taken apart and refuted.Although the film is rather long, at 3 hours, this is understandable as there is a lot of material to cover. It's clearly structured making it easy to watch the subject you're interested in.Be warned though. The director, Chris White, is a fundamentalist Christian and this unfortunately colors his perception on subjects related to biblical events. I was quite surprised to hear him suddenly make leaps of logic that would not have looked out of place on the 'Ancient Aliens' show. It boggles my mind how someone can analyze and debunk that show so logically and lucidly, while apparently being unable to apply that skill to his own beliefs.Still, I would say 90% of the material presented is worthwhile and interesting. Just don't take White too seriously when he deals with claims involving biblical events.