Aaron1375 This film was somewhat funny to a point, but after a certain point it just seems like it has gone on long enough and you just want it to be over. The film is about a woman who does not have any children receiving an unexpected inheritance as she becomes the guardian of a little baby girl. She has problems adjusting to this and this is where the film is at its best, though the best laugh for my money is the scene where the young toddler introduces herself to the boyfriend played by Harold Ramis. The woman wrestles with the idea of putting this child up for adoption, but she meets some people wanting to adopt the child and quickly reconsiders. Cannot say I blame her, as the wife and husband look like a couple who are going to inflict the child with both emotional and physical abuse. Seriously, the way the acted during that meeting the welfare agent present should have said no way. Well the fact she does not give the child up for adoption makes the boyfriend move out and on. Sure, most may think he is a prick for doing so, but it was his choice, having a child was not for him and he went with the way he felt rather than live in misery and transferring said misery to both the woman and the child and then things would have ended in a worse way. Well after a while the woman ends up moving to the country and there are a few more laughs to be had as she has to now adjust living in the country, but the film soon becomes to long as she is in a new romance and she starts a new business. There are laughs in this one, but it is just to long. Comedies that run nearly two hours usually end up being devoid of laughs in to many patches and this one was no exception. Was not awful, but nor was it good.

Radiant_Rose I had read about this film long before I ever saw it. Susan Faludi slated it in her book "Backlash" for being anti-feminist. Perhaps naively, I pretty much took her word for it.I eventually got around to seeing it because James Spader has a small role in it (during the "devious blonde yuppy" phase of his career - he really seems to have it in for yuppies). I was amazed by how completely I disagreed with Faludi.JC (Diane Keaton) is a very determined, resourceful woman. I am not sure how likely it is that she would be able to expand her business without sacrificing her quality time with her adopted daughter and new boyfriend, but I think she'll give it a good try. In my opinion, it is the career-obsessed men who are missing out.This film is saying that women can successfully combine a career and a private life. It may be corny and unrealistic (especially the method by which JC "acquires" baby Elizabeth), but Ms Keaton's character triumphs over adversity.In my opinion, that makes it a feminist film.

caa821 Some movies are just fun to watch -- and this is one of those for me. Diane Keaton is one of the most engaging, likable actresses, in any role, and this one is perfect for her. The story doesn't hold a lot of suspense -- you know where it is going early-on, but that doesn't lessen the enjoyment. All of the supporting characters/actors, in both the sophisticated/big-city/New York setting, and in rural Vermont, are well-cast and likable as well. Keaton and co-star Sam Shepard are also engaging as a couple, with humorous contentions at first, and the romance soon following.The rapidity and degree of her success in her Vermont business venture are somewhat unbelievable (even despite her prestigious business background), but so what?Simply a thoroughly enjoyable, funny, pleasant and uplifting viewing.

Kevin Ludlow I am currently sitting on my couch on Christmas Eve, it's raining outside, freezing cold, and I've had a few glasses of wine. I couldn't have asked for a more relaxing atmosphere.If you ever find yourself in a similar setting and this movie comes on TV, do NOTTTTTTTTT turn it on.I tried to sit through it, but have finally had to turn it off. I never thought a movie could add so much stress to my life, but apparently it can. As if the kid crying every few minutes isn't annoying enough, Keaton can never seem to shut the hell up either. If you're not annoyed by her screaming and/or having multiple breakdowns on screen, you'll most certainly be annoyed by her inability to multitask when presented with the obstacles of a child. She's supposed to be this big shot business woman in the 80's and yet, for some reason, can't seem to find a good nanny in all of NYC to take care of the damn kid. For god sakes, 3 men and a baby worked it out - she can too.I won't begin to suggest this has been a very articulate posting, but I assure you, this movie is awfully irritating. I would strongly suggest staying clear of it.