Battlestar Galactica

2003 "By Your Command."
Battlestar Galactica
8.5| 3h2m| en| More Info
Released: 08 December 2003 Released
Producted By:
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.syfy.com/battlestargalactica
Synopsis

After a 40-year armistice in a war between the Twelve Colonies and the Cylons, the Cylons launch a surprise nuclear attack intended to exterminate the human race. Virtually all of the population of the Twelve Colonies are wiped out.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Trailers & Images

Reviews

UofSciFi Some flaws of the original show are corrected with this remake ....but new flaws are created with the remake where none had existed before!Battlestar purist are gonna hate to hear this but.... the original B.G. was a much flawed creature. For example.... in the 25 years that B.G. has been around, I have probably watch the original pilot episode/movie at least 10 or 15 times. And every time I 've seen it, I am always bugged by the fact that there are 12 home planets and not a single one of those 12 planets has a military base on it, not one of those 12 planets had satellites with long range scanners to see that the Cylon invasion force was coming? Not one of those 12 planets had an antiaircaft missile defense system?...Apparently not!!!!! Even when I watch it for the first time as a 9 year old Kid I asked those questions as the Cylons Raiders went totally unchallenged & unopposed as they delivered death & destruction to the 12 colonies. THE COMMON SENSE REALIST IN ME SAYS THAT THE 12 HOME WORLDS WOULDN'T HAVE NEEDED ANY BATTLESTARS TO DEFEND THEM, BECAUSE THEY WOULD'VE HAD MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND POWERFUL MILITARY BSAS AND THEY WOULD'VE ALSO HAD LONG RANGE SCANNERS MOUNTED ON Satellites AND THEY WOULD'VE KNOWN FAR FAR IN ADVANCE THAT THE ATTACK FORCE WAS COMING AND WOULD'VE BEEN ARMED TO THE HILT AND READY TO BLAST THEM INTO KINGDOME COME WHEN THEY ARRIVED. .....i THINK i'VE MADE MY POINTexit 1978...........enter 2003The heavily flawed Cylon destruction of the colonies that was ridiculously done in the original series was all corrected by the remake...In the remake we learn that Cylons are humanoid robots, and the the colonies are all on the same planet. Unlike the original the remake is much smarter...in the new one the humanoid cylons use sex as a weapon to trick a very young and very horny Boltar into giving them the codes to shut down the planetary defense and shut down all computers systems (including the computers inside the Viper cockpits). After all communications are down and the humans cannot respond against the Cylons. The Cylon's then destroy the planet with Nucular missiles, and plunge it into a post deadly nuclear Holocaust......this is 1000 times more believable& smarter than the original...The remake gets it RIGHT.I still didn't like the concept of changing Starbuck & Boomer to female characters..at first the SCI-FI Channel promised that this was done to enhance the story.....but Starbuck was still a smoking a Cigar, flirting, gambling and brawling..and NO it did not enhance the story at all ...In fact I found myself winding why the just didn't go ahead and hire a male actor to play that role because it wouldn't have compromised any of the story if they had've and it would have made so many fans/purist of the original series B.G. more acceptable to the new series...that remains a mystery to me.The only thing I was strongly objectable too was that the new female Boomer is really a cloaked Cylon spy and doesn't even know it....Was that really needed???? again this change accomplished absolutely nothing and again left the viewer wondering WHY DID THEY DO THAT??Its almost like the 1978 version and the 2003 version counter balance each other , because all of the flaws of the original are corrected in the remake but the 2003 version created many new flaws the were done right the first time in the original version..If you could chop them up and re-edit them into one movie it would be perfect.I also didn't like the fact that the wonderful soundtrack of Stu Phillips wonderful theme music was recycle for the remake. In fact the music in the remake pretty much is nothing more than a drum track and some keyboard music...I was very disappointed with that.I was also disappointed that the new 2003 remake didn't give a lot of good fighter to fighter combat/space battles. We only got to see a couple of skirmishes and that was all. This is a supposed to be a space opra not a soap opra.My last complaint of the new 2003 remake was the sound effects (or the lack there of) ...In the opening sequence we see the destruction of a Human space station. As you are watching the space station explode into a huge fire ball....all you hear is total silence. The happened again when the Cylons Nuked the home world. We get to see the blast but we get to hear only silence.....I didn't shell out a small fortune for my Dolby 5.1 Digital surround sound to see silent explosions -OH! HELL NO!!!!! I hope some of the series editors log onto IMDb and read this!!! When I see explosions on my T.V. screen I want to hear THUNDER in speakers filling my living room with reverb that rattles my windows !!!!
jfarms1956 I would recommend this version of Battlestar Galactica to the 8 and older crowd, in addition to any and all SciFi lovers. The sets were detailed and truly exceptional in some places (probably computer graphics). There are plenty to tech toys and eye candy in this movie. The characters help draw you into the film. Yet, although Battlestar Galacttica does move along quite nicely, it gives you plenty of time to catch your breath without getting bored. In this version of Battlestar Galactica, Starbuck is a woman. I guess that was some of the political correctness the director/writer wanted to show. I found it good entertainment but not a classic. I give it four thumbs up.
Abusimble1 Sad to see Glen A. Larson producing shows like this. The main issue is, what is with the Laura Roslin character? She seems like a man in a woman's body and viewers find this appealing? Also the entire show seems to be about interrogations and more interrogations. The plot seems banal and always week after week the same things are shown. Some conspiracy abounds and this is supposed to be the new great twist every episode. There is hardly any action and the drama is based entirely on having some sort of stale friction between the characters. I highly recommend watching Star Trek: The Next Generation or Star Trek: The Original series if one wants good science fiction episodes. This show isn't science fiction. It's junk.
michael-blackman I saw the original back when it was released in Australia at out local cinema (Bundaberg) in 79 or 1980(?) and loved that and the TV series even if the centurions heads wobble when they talk. Funny stuff! But the re-imagined series just blows my socks off. I like it so much I have bought the DVD's so I can watch them whenever. The casting is superb, the acting is sublime, the writing is sensational, the directors do brilliant work and as far as I am concerned the story line/plot remains basically true to the basic original concept with the obvious perfectly acceptable exceptions here and there. There is not one thing about the new series I can fault. IT ROCKS!! I also completely love the fact that they have changed some of the original male characters to be female. IT'S PER-R-R-R-FECTION with a capital P. I hope there will be many spin off stories. Keep it coming BSG creators!