adonis98-743-186503 Rayne, the half-human/half-vampire warrior, ventures to America's 1880's Wild West to stop the vampired Billy the Kid and his posse of vampire cowboys. BloodRayne II: Deliverance is nowhere near as good as the first film that even tho it wasn't great or even a good film it was at least a fun guilty pleasure, the main girl who portrays BloodRayne might be good looking but looks aren't everything and this film was even super slow boring to the point where the viewers will fell asleep. Overall it's kinda better than the next one but still not a good film and nowhere near as good as the first. (4/10)

MonsterVision99 I will say that I can enjoy a cheesy Uwe Boll trash film, the original BloodRayne its fun to watch and to laugh at, "Rampage" was actually good (even if he ruined it with the sequels), "Postal" at least kept the same tone the game had and his early 2000's stuff its also amusing to watch. "BloodRayne II" its the worst kind of cheap movie, a late 2000's movie that isn't awful enough to be amazed and its not good enough to make it genuinely entertaining.It seems like Uwe Boll doesn't know how to open a movie, doesn't know how to make likable characters, doesn't know how to write decent dialog and doesn't know how to hold a camera still. He goes straight for the blood, the sex and the "cool" action scenes, the problem with that is the fact that everything else seems to be an afterthought and a bigger problem is that scenes of nothing happening are 60% of the movie, not to mention that the gory scenes and the action sequences are badly done, specially the action sequences, they are so poorly executed sometimes you don't even know what the hell its suppose to be happening.I guess this could be the modern day equivalent of something like Billy the Kid Versus Dracula, it seems fitting as this is an awful exploitation movie.It has a few decent performances from some Uwe Boll regulars like Zack Ward and the guy from "Rampage", everyone else pays it like they are in a direct to video sequel to an already bad movie.

Flak_Magnet Unlike the first Bloodrayne, this direct-to-video sequel fails to deliver laughs as an unintentional comedy. I think we got one good chuckle out of it, but spent the majority of the time rolling our eyes and counting the minutes. As a plus, I think this is one of the worst Westerns I've ever seen and its also one of the lamest vampire movies. Unfortunately, though, its just too lame and unfunny to be worth most peoples' time. Expect to see the juvenility and incoherence that defines a Uwe Boll project, but also a drab story that limps along with the help of tired clichés. It isn't really campy; it just sucks. You can skip this one; its totally forgettable. ---|--- Reviews by Flak Magnet

misbegotten Bloodrayne: Deliverance actually received worse reviews than the first film (even those few who wrote positively about Bloodrayne disliked the sequel), but I actually prefer it to the initial movie.The entries in the Bloodrayne series are some of the few vampire films that acknowledge the passage of time from the perspective of an immortal being. The first film is set in 18th century Eastern Europe, and the opening titles depict paintings and illustrations from that period, and also medieval woodcuts. Deliverance takes place in the American West of the late 19th century, and accordingly - after a picture of the castle that was the setting of the climax of the previous film - the opening titles consist of sepia-toned photographs of ships setting sail for the New World, towns being founded, and railroad tracks being laid down. In Bloodrayne, the title character relied on her swords. In Deliverance, time and technology have moved on, and a pair of six-shooters (loaded with silver bullets dipped in holy water and smeared with garlic) are her weapons of choice.There's an admirable amount of period grittiness in Deliverance. Instead of the wide open, dusty plains of most westerns, the movie is set in the depths of winter, and the ground is either covered in snow or been reduced to filthy, churned-up mud. And despite the fact that in the Old West the only sources of indoor illumination were often limited to candles, simple oil lamps and the occasional open fireplace, have you ever noticed in the westerns produced in the 1930s - 1960s how suspiciously well lit all those saloons and ranch interiors were? This was simply because the lighting technicians lit those sets the same way they did for all other movies - for maximum visibility. Deliverance corrects this discrepancy: building interiors are dim and murky, with deep pools of black shadow. It all creates a wonderful sense of authenticity.Kristanna Loken played Rayne in the first movie, but she was unable to reprise the role due to filming the TV series Painkiller Jane, so Nastasha Malthe steps into her shoes. Loken gave a driven and forceful but somewhat one-note performance. In contrast, portraying the same character a hundred years older and wiser, Malthe's Rayne is sullen and cynical, and altogether more fleshed-out and well rounded than Loken's take. And I must say that Malthe looks stunning in her all-black outfit, consisting of a duster (the name given to an ankle-length coat common to the period), flapping leather chaps and wide-brimmed hat. The only returning actor from the initial film is Michael Pare, who had a brief cameo in Bloodrayne and here plays a different character - real life Western legend Pat Garrett, no less.Garrett appearing as Rayne's sidekick is due to a plot element that earns the film it's only minus mark - having Billy the Kid as the main villain. The Kid is bizarrely reinterpreted as an ancient East European vampire, instead of the young, all-American sociopath that he actually was. His inclusion is a gimmick, and it's an unnecessary one. Ironically, as played by Zack Ward (a regular in Uwe Boll's movies) the Kid is an impressive bad guy, but he would have worked better as an original character.Uwe Boll (director and producer of both Bloodrayne films) has promised a third instalment, set in Nazi Germany during World War 2. I'm looking forward to it.