daarbuke This is a terrible film. I understand that they had a very small budget to work with, but that's not an excuse for a bad script and bad editing. There's just so much cheese that you wouldn't believe it.The sets look fake. The weapons look fake. The locations are ridiculous. Everything looks like it's made of cardboard and spray painted with a stone look. The CGI is absurdly bad. I understand that some things are expensive, but there are places where you can buy realistic-looking or even real weapons for cheaper than these fake ones. We have rocks and stones everywhere. There's no shortage of that to resort to using cardboard. There are places that rent out castles and forts for weddings and birthdays, they're not that expensive, I know people that do cosplay and recreations that take videos that look more professional than this.But you can say they had a $1000 budget and everything was beyond their price range, but what's the excuse for the terrible script and cheesy dialogues?Don't watch it unless you're looking for a laugh.

Bahau Ther Poly (bahaupaother) why the movie color setting suck like that i prefer the movie color like series the viking in History channel much more better. Why the Chinese were there (out of topic). We as a viking fan were aspect a better camera color setting for the movie, the story line is good and can be better, should be more attitude for the character (too stiff for a viking), boring all the way *yawn* in the middle of the movie no consistency, we prefer much more attitude & the funny side of them and i quote "do little but the impact is big" OK.. take it or leave it. i comment what i want but u don't have to like it. As i mention before this is my own opinion, it the future the viking movie should be more interesting, cut lose the boring part or make it funny and silly because that's what they are and makes the interesting, & remember to use different movie color setting to give a big impact because the movie color setting was dull and look boring.

ikonlover As to a post from a previous person its exactly what he said its a film nothing more nothing less all about someones story in there mind that they have brought to film its not a real life taken from the books of myths and some peoples reviews are just stupid the reason he could lift Thor's hammer at the end is because as Thor said when he killed his general only the blood of gods that run through a body can lift godly weapons so it shows u didn't watch the film at all you complete numb nuts.as for the Jackie Chan style guy in it it actually made the film better nice just not to see wielded swords axes arrows to have the martial arts expert slave to a hero great touch in movie only thing i disliked is the Johnathon Ross girlfriend style hair Thor had lol bright pinkish red lol that did give me a chuckle but in all the only down point in the film a great watch even the Mrs watched it fantastic

3xHCCH This film is released locally this week as "Vikings: The Real Legend of Thor." I guess they had to promote the fact that there is a character named Thor in this movie to attract audiences, though he is nothing like the Thor of Marvel Comics people want to see. The newspaper ads only herald two of the actors in the B-list cast whom local viewers may vaguely recall.The Christian religion is stealing the thunder away from the traditional Norse gods. Incensed, the violent red-haired god Thor is on a rampage to destroy the world. Another god Frey advises the undead King Eirick, raised from the dead by his beloved goddess of love Freya, that he needs to obtain the Horn from the underworld, Helheim. Only by blowing the horn in the face of Thor can the god of thunder by subdued. Eirich gathers a motley crew of Vikings and goes on a quest to save the earth from the wrath of the gods.The lead role of Eirick was played by Dominic Purcell. For someone with the most important role, he came up with the worst acting of all. There was nothing inspiring about him, which makes the whole film collapse under his wretched performance.Sticking out like a sore thumb is the presence of Jon Foo playing Yang, an Oriental slave. His graceful Chinese-style fighting skills stood out from the brutal sword play and barbaric bludgeoning. I guess we need someone to break the Slavic monotony, and he does his job.Talking about breaking the monotony, that would also explain the inexplicable presence of Natassia Malthe as Brynna, the token female warrior and love interest. I have to admit that her beauty was a welcome distraction among the burly and brawny Vikings.Honestly, the story is not bad at all, with interesting twists and turns towards the second half. However, everything else about this film all scream B-Movie! The props were so unconvincingly fake. Thor's hammer itself looked so flimsy and plastic. The computer-generated imagery were so cheap-looking. The script was bloated with lousy lines. The acting was either very wooden or too hammy. There seemed to be nothing done right at all. 3/10.