fearthebeast360 This is by far the worst movie I have seen The acting was awful, the effects were awful and the action was guess what. Awful! No seriously this movie could have been made by a bunch of five year old kids who have a fond taste for American history. The effects are embarrassing for example at one point in it shot are being fired at Clydes car and they are flashing his leather roof. Furthermore, the film was half full of really dull picture montages in black and white. And finally the props were awful in one point Clyde points a gun at someone but the only problem it the barrel isn't hollow.Do not watch this film unless you want to be bored out of your mind for 85 minutes

siys This is an awful film with absolutely no merit. There's so much wrong with this film, I don't know where to begin.There's no action, no plot and the film is filled with several overly long photo montages that are tedious.The budget was so low there is virtually no realism. Money shown is current currency, one of the newspaper headlines has a blatant spelling error and all gunfire is depicted with cheesy computer generated flashes.I'd say this is more like a student film, but that would be insulting to student films.Avoid at all costs, as this film is a complete waste of time with no redeeming values.

Garrett F. I had to laugh when I watched this, and in fact I did. The part at approx. 75:45 made me laugh the most. It looked like one of the show's producers Photoshopped the building (penitentary or castle?) into the scene. I also love the fake-looking flashes they too edited in.Also, I believe Clyde always drove Ford's. Don't quote me on that, but I think that is how it was. The Roadster they were in in the beginning I don't believe was a Ford. Also, I believe the real B&C stole many cars, in the movie they only had two cars.I also have to make note how half the movie is black and white movies. All the scenes were in the same dessert, including the "Indiana" scene. I just wonder where that $1,000,000 they had went.All in all: the A&E version was 10 times better. I've never seen the 1967 version so I can't compare it with that one, but I'm sure the 1967 one was the best out of all of them.Would I recommend this movie? Hill no! If you can, watch the 1967 version, or at least the A&E version, which I will also review.

cageyue A truly dreadful remake. The action is non-existent which in such a dramatic and action packed story is beyond belief. In close up sepia stills (which take up a significant part of the film) you can clearly see that the guns are fake, and poor ones at that with no hole in the muzzle. Got bored well before the end and switched off before it got any worse!Apparently I need to write more lines of text, so I will use those lines to pay homage to the Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway 1967 film of the same title, which even though it was filmed forty six years earlier than this 2013 effort, is far superior in every single way.