tgcrouch The film was of inconsistent quality and dialogue, and while an admirable attempt was made to bring in further opinion with the trip to Thailand, they should definitely have included more footage of the Thai masseuse at the hotel....PHWOAR.The film was of inconsistent quality and dialogue, and while an admirable attempt was made to bring in further opinion with the trip to Thailand, they should definitely have included more footage of the Thai masseuse at the hotel....PHWOAR.

studioAT The first film has warmth, strong characters and a sense of heart. This sequel has none of these things and feels like a pointless sequel only produced to make money.It feels like a bunch of sketches strung together by a very weak plot which is worrying seeing as it is supposed to be based on a book. It has funny moments but even these feel rehashed and tired. Zellweger, Grant and Firth are all talented but even they cannot save this film from being the poor imitation of the first film.Sequels rarely work and this one is proof. It's perhaps worth watching once but certainly not worth wasting money on by the DVD. Save your money and watch the first film.

Malki Baby I am a big fan on the Bridget Jones films. The first and the second movie were amazing..Never a dull moment, there are definitely laugh out loud moments even watching it more then once.I nearly fell over the first time I saw the skiing segment and in the first movie Mr. Tits-pervert =) Directing and making movies its not an easy task although it may seem like it..Movies can never be like the book, so please..get over it.There is not one movie out there that is exactly like the book it portrays.I recommend this movie, there is no romantic comedy that I like better. British humor at its best, whimsical and fun all the way through. 10/10

buiger I don't know why they insist on making remakes when they know from the start that they cannot make anything nearly as good as the original... What a waste of time and money. Bridget Jones 2 is a classic example: this is a film that 'lives' based exclusively on the success of it's predecessor. This is a film without any fresh ideas, any style, a film that has nothing to say and is going nowhere apart from re chewing the same material of the original in a horrible fashion. Worse of all, it isn't even funny any more...What a pity to waste so much acting talent on something that everyone new from the start wasn't going to fly. In his review of the original movie, Ebert started off by saying "Glory be, they didn't muck it up" and I couldn't have agreed with him more in that instance. Well, this time they certainly did muck it up!