wes-connors UK Prime Minister "Winston Churchill is traveling across Africa during the second World War. Nazi terrorists sabotage the train and take Churchill hostage. Counter-espionage agents Jason Connery (son of Sean Connery) and Francesco Quinn (son of Anthony Quinn) attempt to save him, and perhaps prevent the collapse of the allied war effort," according to the DVD sleeve description, "'Casablanca Express' is a taunt thriller with explosive action sequences." Interesting to see the sons of two very accomplished actors in such an unimpressive movie. The younger Connery and the younger Quinn are, arguably, more handsome in appearance, but less attractive on screen. At least in this movie; "Casablanca Express" is only one film, and not a very good one. It really seems to be set in the 1980s, poorly pretending to be World War II of the 1940s. Allied actors Glenn Ford, Donald Pleasence, and Jean Sorel amount to naught.**** Casablanca Express (12/22/89) Sergio Martino ~ Jason Connery, Francesco Quinn, Jinny Steffan, Glenn Ford

drystyx The plot is a WWII attempt by Axis powers to kidnap Winston Churchill.What we have is an epic style film here, one of those larger than life Indiana Jones type flicks that isn't meant to be taken seriously, and goes instead for the thrills and bangs.And it pretty well does that. We have mega stars Pleasance and Ford doing the older officer bits, and we have young action heroes doing quite well in the "not to be taken seriously" action. Of course it is off the wall action, but there really isn't any attempt by the director to disguise this. This is James Bond or Indiana Jones style escapism.The characters are not overly deep, but more intended to convey comedy. Again, there is no attempt to disguise this.We have some surprises, especially in the identity of the spy. Nothing big, just enough to make it entertaining.Lots of needless shooting and silly action scenes. If you like Bond flicks, you'll like this, though. Same thing.

meransom Since I like World War Two as a movie genre, I tend to be a bit more kind in my criticism than others. I found the set designs, wardrobe and ambiance acceptable. I found Jinny Steffan more than appealing, and believe the film would have been much more tolerable for me if her ample "attributes" had been exploited more. And, as others have pointed out, this film is anything but memorable — and for all of the historical, political and military inaccuracies already pointed out. In addition, prior to this, I had never seen any World War Two ground troops, Army OR Marine, who wore jump suits, especially jump suits complete with leggings. As for goofs, in the final scene, Jason Connery (with a gunshot wound in his left leg) and Jinny Steffan walk away from the doomed train. However, with each step, he puts his full weight on his left leg and limps on his right as she supposedly holds him up.

ETO_Buff It is difficult to find enough bad things to say about this movie. It is even more difficult to imagine why Glenn Ford and Donald Pleasance would agree to be in this movie. As far as realism and historical accuracy: Non-existent. The only way a person could find this movie realistic is if they just moved here from another planet.Here are just a few technical examples of the poor quality of this film:The U.S. Army personnel are wearing uniforms that are currently in use (issued in the early 1980s). The soldiers use helmet liners instead of complete helmets (liner and "iron pot"). The U.S. flags that are shown have 50 stars (instead of the 48-star flag which was in use from 1912 until 1960).I rated it two stars because unfortunately, I have seen worse movies.