Dark Side of the Moon

2002 "Top secret."
Dark Side of the Moon
7.6| 0h52m| en| More Info
Released: 16 October 2002 Released
Producted By: ARTE
Country: France
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A French documentary or, one might say more accurately, a mockumentary, by director William Karel which originally aired on Arte in 2002 with the title Opération Lune. The basic premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo 11 Moon landing was faked and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help from director Stanley Kubrick.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

ARTE

Trailers & Images

Reviews

vvp_14 SPOILERS - DON'T READ IF YOU INTEND TO WATCH ITBefore watching it I didn't know what exactly it was; opinions seemed to differ. But having watched it, I'd say this documentary is also a good test of how easily you can be fooled into believing anything you told that seems logical on the surface.Right from the start I couldn't believe what I was hearing from the narrator. That the Apollo program was to become Star Wars. That the moon landing was to cover up a money laundry agenda with funds going missing. That the public really needed some warm up with the help of Hollywood to greet the moon landing with enthusiasm. That NASA used lots of ideas from 2001 Odyssey. That Hollywood changed the spacesuits, changed the rocket, they even moved the launch pad to get better shot angle. By any stretch of imagination this was just a line of stupid suggestion, however convincingly told.Then come these interviews with top US officials who never mention the subject they are discussing, not a single word from the four people in the room about the Moon, or any names dropped, let alone mentioning faking the landing in a studio. That's why you don't hear the questions from the interviewer. You film a conversation on one subject and then use the words to make it look like they talk about another. You can then insert these bits of the interview into any narrative you want. They might as well all be talking about their fishing trips or some covert op in Korea in the 50's or a movie they watched.END OF SPOILERSOh, boy, they really did take the Mickey out of those Moon-hoax Kubrick-did-it-all theorists. Nice effort. Particularly was important to have Kubrick's wife on the screen. She must be tired of all this moon-hoax rubbish herself. Oh, and you do have to watch the film right through to the end of the credits.On a side note to those Moon-hoax believers. You really need to get out of the box and look at the bigger picture, and most importantly read about space exploration history. And here's freebie for you to get you going. If you know anything about the Russian space program of the 60's and the Moon race that Soviet Union was part of you must have heard of Alexei Leonov - the first person to walk in outer space back in March 1965. He was soon made the lead cosmonaut of a group of cosmonauts that were scheduled to walk on the Moon.When the Americans first walked on the Moon in July 1969, the Soviet deep space receiving station at Eupatoria (on the Black Sea) was receiving all transmissions from those Apollo flights including the surface of the Moon and they were specialists and they knew for a fact these were coming from the Moon and not Hollywood, California via some remote satellite. When the whole world was watching those live TV images from the Moon only two countries in the world were not televising them - Soviet Union and China. And so Alexei Leonov with other cosmonauts were sitting in a locked room in Ostankino television centre, Moscow, watching those live picture coming from the Moon surface as it was the only place where they could. Leonov, a smart man, trust me, confirmed it in his interviews and If there was even a shade of doubt this wasn't for real the Soviets would be the first to expose it as they would be the most interested party in it.And one the final note. When some years from now, and that time will come for sure, when astronauts land on the moon again, and we will see a flag waving again in 1/6 of Earth gravity and in zero air resistance where inertia is a lot higher than that on Earth, these moon-hoax theory supporters will feel incredibly stupid. Definitely worth watching.
imdb-14312 Some of the comments here just prove precisely what the director was trying to say.One of the reasons the show was so good was that it wasn't obvious it was a "mockumentary" until you were well and truly in it. The director just kept sliding up the "mock volume" throughout the entire show. Basically, when all your friends are around and talk about it, you say something like "hey, when did you figure it out?" and one person will say, "I was sucked in. I didn't figure it out until the (obviously American) CIA troops went in under cover and left McDonalds wrappers floating about - about two thirds in", and someone else says they didn't get it till close to then end. Someone else says they sussed it out very early on.But the point is, they all get it sometime. The director keeps hamming it up until he finally goes obvious towards the end. And if you still don't get it, then you probably believe in Santa Claus!!I will say, however, that I can understand English-as-a-second-language-ers not "getting" it because it plays a lot on language cues for satire and they may not be so obvious to someone not fluent in English. I think a lot of the 1/10 people are in this category.One of the best TV shows I've ever seen. 10/10 easily. The only other show that scores 10/10 for me was the TV series The Singing Detective. Somewhat different, mind.
iamjantje The documentary is not about the discussion if the moon landing of Neil Armstrong and Buzz is fake. The've been there all right. However there is no actual evidence because of defect equipment. To avoid this setback in 'the race for space' the CIA have used Stanley Kubrick's studios in London to make a few moments of footage which was later on showed to the world as if they where original.This movie shows the world how emergency footage was already shot before the landing and used to impress the world. The information given by such people as Rumsfeld is to me unbelievable..Watch this for start to end, and don't judge based on a few minutes as sarastro... Du taget fejl min Ven, den her film er bare ved!
grinten38 Amusing, to say the least. Very convincing in the beginning, rather ludicrous towards the end. Contrary to popular belief this documentary does not state that the USA never went to the moon. It merely hints at the possibility that the pictures the world saw in 1969 were in fact staged. The documentary makes fun at the lunar hoax-theory, and cleverly, as mentioned before by someone else on this board, it could very well be a contra lunar hoax theory by the Government of the USA. What makes this documentary really stand out is the fact that top ranked officials speak uncandidly on camera. The viewer is left wondering why serious politicians would collaborate with a French documentary on a conspiracy theory? Maybe there is more to this documentary than the fact that it is meant to make fun of the lunar hoax theory. All in all, very entertaining.