andrew jones This slop doesn't deserve a long review,so here it goes.Bored one night, nothing good on TV saw this....you know how it goes on.Here we a have fat Stephen Baldwin putting in zero effort. I've seldom seen a more lethargic performance from any actor. It really is worth watching just to see an "actor" get away with doing so little.The story could of been of slight interest in some ways, but then so could taking the lid of a tin of paint and watching it go hard.Any tiny good points or sci- fi elements are totally ruined by Baldwins asmatic,lazy and stilted acting. Awful

hard-chine Unfortunately I saw those terrible '50's movies when they were new. It appears one of those plots was resurrected and given to a monkey chained to a typewriter.The script is hollow because it starts with a lack of understanding of dark matter. In a good sci. fi. piece, this is an advantage- it gives the writers an opportunity to rewrite reality by explaining the new rules of the universe as now discovered and expounded by the characters, showing their "genius." Our writers did not explain anything, let alone set up the plot for development. Instead, vague terms which had no logical relation to other vague terms were bandied about by almost lifeless drones, leaving the viewers worse than perplexed.The characters were given no personality by the script, and the actors could not (probable) or would not (possible) give a personality to their characters by exertion of acting skills. Therefore,no character flaws could be developed or remedied. Moreover, technologies (the lifeblood of sci. fi.) remained absolutely static. The technological solution was given in the first 20 lines, and was not developed past that. Even the superhero plot line, an almost foolproof device, was just plain awful. (I've always wondered how the modern term "awful" developed- from the "full of awe" meaning, or a different spelling for "offal." Viewers will have absolutely no question as applied to this film.) Most distressingly, the lead character was played with all the emotional range of chalk. Even after receiving powers which were described as "God like," the character could not find an emotion to display that might be a consequence of dealing with such a life changing event. The only interesting question regarding this film is how it found financial backers. Some actresses claim there has never been a lack of funds for any picture where they went topless. That could not have been a factor here: hardly a midriff went bare. But no matter how much money was spent, this film was a colossal loss of everything expended. So how and why was it ever made?

Michael O'Keefe Sci-Fi Original written and directed by Jason Bourque. Don't take over-seriously, but enjoy some decent special effects. A group of scientists on a top secret military base make a discovery that may even be bigger than the Atomic bomb. Code name Eruptor, a device that supercharges matter and changes its molecular structure of its target. The project malfunctions and a top notch scientist Daniel Gray(Stephen Baldwin)is personally effected by 'Dark Matter'...infected is more like it; and it allows him to at will change weather and surrounding atmosphere. This project also has the ability in the wrong hands threaten the entire world. Is Armageddon far away? Maybe guaranteed boredom. Baldwin shows effort, but just not enough to change this stinker. The cast also includes: Carrie Genzel, Gardiner Millar, Camille Sullivan and William B. Davis.

kiawa77 Here are some things that are a better use of your time than watching this film:Cleaning the toilet with a toothbrush.... Reciting Neil Diamond lyrics.... Vaccuuming your entire home twice.... Watching dust collect on your coffee table.... Sitting at your doctor's waiting room just for practice.... Calling an elderly female relative.... Listening to static on your radio.... Watching flies mate.... Doing any paper mache project.... Blowing bubbles.I admit that I could not watch this one to the end, and I've made it all the way through some really bad Sci Fi Originals. This one lacks substance at every turn, with characters having about as much personality as a doorknob. It made little sense to me, not because of a complicated storyline, but because I could not bear to pay much attention to it. This film is brutal in its boredom, and you would be wise to stay away!