Leofwine_draca DRAGON is an example of The Asylum doing what they're best known for, which is ripping off a Hollywood blockbuster purely to fool people into picking this DVD off the shelf by mistake. This one's a rip-off of ERAGON but turns out to be the usual fantasy junk, full of LORDS OF THE RINGS cliches and very little else. A group of badly acting and mannered characters roam around in the woods in a bid to dispel some dark lord or other, and they tend to wear old cast-offs with bits of chain mail and the like. Some are made up to be elves. There are some limited special effects but the CGI is so bad that they're underused, which is all for the good. As Asylum movies go, this is one of the worst and least entertaining of them all.

TheLittleSongbird I saw this on the Syfy channel, expecting it to be literally horse-poop. But while Dragon is far from a great film, it isn't awful either, better than in my opinion the tepid rating and reviews suggest. I did like the costumes, scenery and sets and the photography was mostly decent, the music was serviceable as were most of the effects and I did like the concept which looked as though I was despite Syfy's reputation of making mostly crap in for a typically fun fantasy film. As for the dragon, at times it does look good with an interesting design, but it is lacking in consistency and doesn't always blend well with its surroundings. The acting is also mixed, some are charismatic and likable, others are rather stiff. The characters aren't really that well written or developed but they aren't annoying or unlikeable mostly. Where I do find the most fault with Dragon is the sloppy direction, weak and cheesy script and uneven storytelling(too many scenes that either drag or serve little purpose to the plot). And also with the hackneyed fight sequences, tighter editing wouldn't have gone amiss. All in all, Dragon is far from great but I have seen a lot worse, and also despite its many problems this is one of Syfy's more tolerable films. 5/10 Bethany Cox

fred-farahani Proved fact,,any movie directed or somehow Scot's done something in the movie just stay away,,waste of electricity your time,,money whatever... Scot harper must be from a mental institution or something,,i don't know who lets this useless idiot fag make movies, i mean if u ever see the name Harper ,just say no to the movie,,after watching that alien vs hunter of his,,damn, all i think is killing the producer, it'd actually make me feel good and i won't feel bad about it. i think i just want beat him to death, slow death ..don't ask my why SCot harper i hope u die and burn in hell and i don't know what to say, so Scot harper must die i just hope he dies before producing another movie

Keith Weatherby II I'll give it a 6 for not terrible acting, the action scenes are OK and the effects are not great but you can tell they had a low budget to work with. The reason I didn't give it higher is mostly because it's slow, and there's way too much talking. Most of the time they're not even moving while talking. Granted to tell a story he wanted to tell, with limited budget of course he felt he had to have the characters reveal the story, but that's just exposition, which is not what movies were made for.Had to fast forward it through half the movie to keep from getting bored. If they would have kept them moving at least, you'd have something. But 5 stars for effort 1 more for everything else.