TheLittleSongbird 'Eye in the Sky's' main attraction was not for me the fascinating subject. It was not because of my love for the genre. It was because of the immensely talented cast, Helen Mirren, Alan Rickman, Barkhad Abdi and Aaron Paul have been great and more in other things, with my main reason for seeing 'Eye in the Sky' being Rickman in his final screen role before his ultimely death two years ago from pancreatic cancer (a loss still very deeply felt).While not a flawless film as such, and it has proven to be a film that has polarised viewers, 'Eye in the Sky' is truly impressive. There are many fine things and its best elements are superb. What some have found heavy handed, dull, dubious morally and one-sided, was to me a film that was gripping, tense and one that approached its subject matter intelligently and strived not to be too conventional or too simple. Can totally understand the polarisation though, it's a controversial subject in the first place and it was always going to be very hard for any film how to approach it, 'Eye in the Sky' does this well. Maybe the sentimentality towards the end is a touch too much and maybe the message was hammered home a little too thickly. Otherwise, there was nothing to fault 'Eye in the Sky'. Where it most excels is with the casting, with Helen Mirren being cast against type and doing so with authoritative steel. Aaron Paul is as great as he was in 'Breaking Bad' and Barkhad Abdi shows his versatility in a role different to the one he had in 'Captain Phillips'. Alan Rickman however gives the best performance, he is commanding and splendidly droll and there was an element of poignancy too knowing that it was his last performance.The film has nail-biting tension and suspense, unfolds deliberately but never dully (was actually on the edge of my seat the whole time) and was never hard to follow while not ever getting simplistic. It made a real effort to be balanced and handles a difficult subject with tact and intelligence, with it not overdoing or trivialising the full impact of the situation and bravely not falling into clichéd genre tropes or providing easy or over-convenient answers. The main point and moral is generally made effectively. The script is thoughtful and well written and some of the film is also very heartfelt and brings a lump to the throat.It is a very well made film visually, having the right amount of grit and stylishness and capturing the claustrophobic confinement of the setting with authenticity. The direction is always at ease with the material and doesn't lose control or let go. Although, truly impressive. 8/10 Bethany Cox

gotgolf-1 This is an ultra liberal movie that is really pathetic. Do not waste your time watching this. The only question I have is how could they have made the film even more stupid? What a complete waste of everyone's time and effort. What could have made these mediocre actors sign up for such a worthless film? Most of them were probably dying to get a paycheck while the others were too stupid to recognize just how worthless this film was.

invisibleunicornninja I watched the first 22 minutes of this movie, which I believe is an adequate length of time to wait for a movie to get good. It didn't. This movie is extremely boring. It may be well-shot, but that's the only thing that its got going for it. The acting is bad, the sound design is bad, and the plot is nonexistent. I will usually watch a movie all the way through, just to give it a chance, but this movie is just really boring.

Alaa Alawneh This film tells you that killing children is painful for pilots and decision-makers in America and Britain but ultimately necessarySweet Propaganda and Smart Because this film is for the British , and the British scene is smarter and more insidious than the American So they need to make a good movie to convince them to justify the killing of black Muslim childrens