Roger Burke This is a disturbing, psychological story that centers upon the private narrative of a man who – like many people – hides repression and aggression behind an overly calm exterior: in short, an example of the passive-aggressive personality type.At once protagonist and antagonist, Mikael (Ulrich Thomsen) is in crisis with himself: he's at the mid-point of his life, he's lost his way at work and on enforced leave, and he sits around at home with this wife and daughter wondering what to do next. He exercises. He reads. He watches TV. He and his wife, Sigrid (Paprika Steen) have their married relatives, Frederick (Lars Brygmann) and Ellen (Stine Stengade), over for dinner often; they all discuss news, listen to music, see movies, talk about life, politics and so on. The two men often row together for exercise and camaraderie. Crucially, Mikael keeps a very private diary on his computer, the content of which is periodically narrated in voice-over throughout the story.We learn that Frederick is a psychologist (perhaps psychiatrist) who is conducting test trials of a new medication designed to counter depression. It's cutting edge stuff; but there are potential, unspecified and serious side-effects. Yet, privately and away from the women, Mikael pleads with Frederick to be part of the trial. Frederick agrees, but issues strict guidelines of use when he hands over a package. Mikael agrees.Weeks pass while Mikael settles into the routine of taking one tablet per day and weekly visits to Frederick's office for blood tests and scans. Subtly and gradually, we see that Mikael's actions begin to take turns for worse, beginning with a random act of violence on a stranger, followed by an improper suggestive proposal to a young woman that just stops short. But, Mikael feels good – for the first time in months, he feels alive...So Mikael ups the ante for himself: he starts taking more than one tablet per day and that's when his repressed desires turn upon his wife, his daughter and Ellen, with suspenseful and unsettling results. But not quite the results that one might expect because there's a twist to this story that makes the end even more unnerving and, for this viewer, more believable.So, this is not a story that's fast-paced. It's no thriller. It is suspenseful, however, as we see how Mikael relates to his family, friends and others and how his personality subtly and overtly changes for the worse. Best of all, we know always what's going on inside his head.I've seen Ulrich Thomsen in Brothers (2004) and The Silence (2010), both excellent and harrowing psychological portrayals of disturbed personalities. With this addition, there's no doubt he is a fine actor who can carry difficult roles well; however, he might risk becoming type-cast. The rest of the cast is more than adequate. But this is Thomsen's movie, being in the frame for nearly every bleak, color de-saturated scene, and with the additional symbolism of the closing scene staying with this viewer long after.I guess you can see this film as an indictment of excessive recourse to drugs for social and psychological ills; on the other hand, maybe it's just a picture of post-post-modernism in which many are struggling to cope with diminishing expectations. I can relate to both. Give it a seven.Recommended, but not for kids.November 21, 2011.

corky-27 but only a so-so rendering of what ultimately is the harrowing depiction of a man's mid-life crisis. Thomsen is awesome, as is Steen, and the atmosphere is "Dogmetically" foreboding, but the protagonist is never convincingly portrayed in any way other than the selfish, psychotic lout that he embodies throughout. I loved Levring's The King Is Alive, and in fact gave it a rare (for me) 10 rating on this website. But for me this is a classic case of a film failing to become greater than the sum of its parts. In the end, a decent enough character study, with a neat twist at the end, but nothing we haven't seen before, and done much better (Michael Douglas in Falling Down came to mind for me, at least). 5 out of 10 on my IMDb-ometer.

krouses "When you always try to stay in the right track, it is nice to leave it". These are the words spoken by Mikael (Ulrich Thomsen), a 42 year old man who desires a change in his life. In this Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde - inspired drama, directed by Kristian Levring, Mikael is offered the opportunity to be a guinea pig and partake in a clinical trial for a new anti-depressant drug. Without even a slight hesitation, he accepts the offer to be a subject in the study, but fails to mention his involvement to either his wife Sigrid (Paprika Steen) or daughter Selma (Emma Sehested Hoeg). After a few weeks, the study is canceled due re- occurring dangerous side effects. This does not stop Mikael, who likes the way the pills make him feel and he continues on with the abandoned trial. Pretty soon, Mikael begins to lose control and no one, not even Mikael himself can predict what he will do next. Levring does an excellent job of keeping the audience on the edge of their seats throughout this suspenseful drama. One of Levring's core beliefs is that "civilization is a wonderful thing, but we need to keep in mind that people are animals who need a certain freedom". This theme can be seen in almost all of his films and we especially see this displayed in Den Du Frygter. For most of his life, Mikael worked and lived a relatively ordinary life. While this is all fine and good for the majority of people, Mikael wanted to add more excitement and have more freedom in his life. We see this when he is out rowing with his good friend Fredrick (Lars Brygmann), who happens to also be one of the lead physicians in the study, if he can be one of the test subjects. He thought taking the anti-depressants might spice up his life a bit. Granted Mikael took things a little too far, but he also had so many years of boredom and frustration building up in his life that I think he would have eventually erupted whether he took the anti-depressant drugs or not.In all the trailers I saw before actually watching Den Du Frygter, I was under the assumption that there would be a lot of violence shown in the film. This was not the case. I found this film to be interesting in the fact that it deals with some very violent situations, but it actually shows very little violence. After watching a post film interview, Levring made it clear that he did not want graphic violence to be represented because he believed it would take the audience away from focusing on the main themes and plot of the movie. I think this was a huge risk by Levring and it might ultimately steer some people away from viewing this film. For me personally, I think the omission of the graphic violence adds more suspense to the film and kept me on the edge of my seat wondering what Mikael is going to do next. In terms of the film-making, Levring adds several little details which enhance the overall quality of the film. For one, the house used in the film has lots of windows and is very wide open, which is interesting because the film deals with people who like to conceal everything. The movie could have been made incorporating several shadows and darker scenes, but instead Levring decides to go against the norm and add his own unique flare to the film. Sticking with themes in the house, Levring takes particular pride in his set designs; he strives to get away from your typical "IKEA" house that you see in other films. Having been one of the four founders of the Dogma 95 movement in Denmark, Levring likes to add more naturalness in his films. For those who might not be familiar with Dogma 95, it was a cinematic political act in response to Hollywoodization. Den Du Frygter is not considered to be a Dogma 95 film, but some aspects of the movement are still visible in the film. For example, almost everything that was actually filmed was put into the movie. Very little extra footage was left out of the film, which is common in all of the Dogma 95 movies. Also you see some infidelity in this film, which was another popular theme during the movement. Even though details like these are minute, they help the film stand out and differentiate itself. As long as you are not looking for a movie with extreme amounts of gore and violence, I think you will be pleasantly surprised with Kristian Levring's Den Du Frygter. The acting is superb, and the film pays significant attention to detail. I would recommend the movie to anyone looking for an intense thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat while trying to anticipate what will happen next.

TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews Hitchcock would be proud. The art of hinting within cinema is still alive. This doesn't spell everything out for you. The trailer for this does not do it justice. I was not expecting to enjoy this as much as I did. It is a film about discontentment, control, and the urges and thoughts lying just beneath the surface. I was pleased to find that Anders Thomas Jensen helped write this, as I enjoyed Blinkende Lygter(or Flickering Lights) and Mørke(also known as Murk), the latter in particular. I would say that you can tell that he had a hand in making this. I believe this is the first film by Levring I've seen, but I certainly am taking notice to his directorial style. Interesting choices are made, among other places in framing and cutting. The editing and cinematography are definitely worth attention. The story-telling is very subtle, and the use of narration does not become a crutch. The pacing is spot-on, it never moved too slow or fast. The acting is excellent, every single performance is beyond reproach. Even the kid, and that's not something that happens all that often. The use of music is good. This can be rather intense, and proper care is taken to build up suspense. There is a little sexuality including obscured nudity, as well as a bit of language and bloodless violence in this. I recommend this to anyone who wants the themes explored for 95 minutes, and/or those who dig a great thriller. 8/10