Bezenby This film gets a bad rap on here, but how bad is a film that's full of wall to wall nudity and gore? Not that bad, I'd say. Fine, it's all cheaply done and mostly involves the characters being seduced and then torn to pieces, but it's a damn sight more interesting than a lot of the crap I've been sitting through recently. A bunch of parapsychologists turn up at a famous haunted house, to do a bit of research. The owner, sinister and suave, offers them loads of cash if they can spend the night in the house and figure out what's going on. Our team of victims, I mean characters, involves three 'experts', two film geeks (one of whom, as per usual, remarks that the house would make a great horror film), and a clairvoyant whose brain damaged expression when she looks at a portrait of the original owner should give you a laugh. Everyone typically splits up and that's when things get interesting. There's some Fulci-style zombies wandering around, but the main focus is on certain ladies our characters encounter. By turns our characters are drawn in by the full frontal nudity and seduction, but one by one find themselves eaten by the girls, who transform into horrible demons. For the most part, this is what the film mainly consists of. Then again, I wasn't really complaining either. Gory deaths aside, there is some semblance of plot and exposition, and a couple of (well telegraphed) twists to boot. The soundtrack, by eccentric guitarist buckethead, is worth noting. Flesh for the Beast might be a cheaply made, badly acted gore fest, but at least it's got a bit of bite, and a distinct lack of smugness that a lot of horror films seem to include ever since Scream was forced upon us.

michael-1020 Okay, to begin with this film was worth what I paid for it, which was less than a cup of coffee.If you have bought this film and are disappointed with it, here is what to do.You will need speakers that you can easily switch from one sound source to the other. Whenever the 'scary' bits turn up in this film, swap from the DVD audio to an mp3 player with the Scooby Doo theme on loop.Because that's what this is, it's Scooby Doo horror and hilarious when you realise it. A group of mystery hunters investigate a house where people disappear, then there is lots of (female only) nudity and lots of (male only) blood and gore, then someone gets their disguise pulled off and everything is quickly resolved. And they would have gotten away if it wasn't for all you pesky monsters.Don't look for good acting or good characterization, the men are all too stupid to live and the women are pretty shallow. Although in fairness the actors may be really great, they just don't get much to work with.

dolce_knights43 "Flesh for the beast" makes no pretensions on being an art house horror film. This is a Grindhouse film of the highest order and it is supported by its simple premise: a group of Paranormal investigators are called upon a mysterious figure to investigate a house which has a knack for mutilating guests. Of course, they soon will follow the departed as a coven of full-frontal-nude nymphomaniac demons murder them in the most gruesome ways imaginable but not before having sex with them first. So you get your haunted house+full-frontal-nude demons+new ways to gruesomely die. Awesome! Based on what I read, people seem to be expecting some sort of story from this film. Good luck guys! Can't you people see that this is for the exploitation crowd? This is not a movie where you ponder on what a fat, overrated Italian mob boss is gonna do next. This movie is a throwback to the late 70's eurohorror trash we love like "Mark of the devil" and "Anthropopagous".I loved the killings and the true greyhound's will love it too. Be prepared for gallons of blood and guts splashing on walls. Sexploitation fans need not worry too since I remember a lot of sex scenes before the killings. Enjoy!

slayrrr666 "Flesh for the Beast" is one of the creepier zombie movies around.**SPOILERS**Arriving at a large mansion, parapsychology group Erin Cooper, (Jane Scarlett) Ted Sturgeon, (Clark Beasley Jr.) Jack Ketchum, (Jim Coope) Joseph Monks, (David Runco) Douglas Clegg, (Aaron Clayton) and Martin Shelly, (Michael Sinterniklaas) are greeted by John Stoker, (Sergio Jones) about the house being haunted. Almost immediately taunted by the supernatural forces, they go to work trying to rid the house of it's presence. Wandering through, they each encounter a force inside the house, and are soon under attack from demonic spirits. The longer inside the house, the more violent and intense the visions become until they are assaulted by a horde of ravenous zombies. Racing to unravel the mystery of the house's history, they work to get out of the house alive before they are killed and become inhabitants of the house.The Good News: This is one of the more surprising films out there. One of the film's biggest pluses is that there is an extreme and overloaded amount of blood and gore in this. This one doesn't skimp out at all, and really lets it fly. We get a finger into the throat, setting off a torrential rain of blood, a severed arm leaving a trail of blood on the floor from the stump, a victim tacked to the ceiling with pins in the hands, a throat ripped out, and the film's single most graphic kill, a victim has hands thrust into their stomach, playing with the entrails in the wound, followed by having his entire inner organs vomited up in slow, grisly fashion. With it being so realistic-looking, this derives a lot of pleasure from it's over-the-top feeling. Other times include a victim stumbling into the eviscerated corpse of a previous kill, which is missing everything from the waist-down and another character being completely covered head-to-toe in blood showered from above. There's really no stop to this, this is full-on all the way, and it gets major points for it. The location of the film, a giant Gothic mansion with long, dark hallways, huge rooms and decayed state provide some plentiful suspense. It's also suspenseful in it's own right, with a marvelous trick of having each character's death scene transpire by having them alone with the rest of the hallway or room completely black. A sudden noise or movement will draw them to their death, and the set-up works each and every time. The fact that the demons also appear in human form with the addition of solid black eyes is it's best trick, allowing for untold disturbances to come from it. The supernatural occurrences are pretty creepy, with voice-overs, instant appearing and disappearing, and much, much more. This has a mildly creepy atmosphere. They even look really creepy, with long distortions to the mouth and jaws and a solid, featureless face with the cold, black eyes. They're instantly memorable and look creepy. In the sleazy side of the film, there's an abundance of nudity in the film. Every major actress in this flick doffs it for the audience. Nudity is given in a rare full-frontal mode, allowing for it all to be shown. This one has a lot going for it.The Bad News: There isn't a whole lot wrong with this one. Most of what's wrong comes from the written side. The story itself is incredibly cliché, having been done countless times before and essentially copied verbatim here, offering no real surprises at all. This could lead the film to appear to be quite predictable, since it rarely wavers from the norm. the set-up has been done countless times before and this one is no different. Another flaw in the writing is that this has to be the flat-out dumbest group of paranormal investigators anywhere. One man after another falls victim to the wiles of the ladies of the manor, who, according to their client, shouldn't even be there. They were warned about it, and they still succumbed to the hordes. Not really wanting of the group. The film's last flaw, and it's most glaring, happens to concern the nudity. There are several sex scenes in this movie, but the men keep their pants completely on, and they last all of ten seconds. The simulated sex is so clumsy that there's barely any guilty pleasure to be had. Couldn't any of the demon/woman/seductresses at least pretended to take a guy's pants off before she started humping him? That seems like a rather basic requirement for what's transpiring, yet nothing comes off except the women's clothes. However, this one is really the most noticeable due to the amount of sex in the film, and isn't anything that could call for it's ouster.The Final Verdict: Beyond a few really harmless gripes, this one is a really good entry in the genre. It's got a lot to really like about it, including tons of gore and nudity, and would be a fine viewing for any gore-hound or zombie fan.Rated R: Extreme Graphic Violence, Full Nudity, Graphic Language and several sex scenes