ksf-2 Marj Main had been in the biz about ten years when this part rolled around. (My favorite role for her is "The Women", not to mention all the Ma Kettles.) Of course, Beery had been in silents for YEARS, and made the transition to talkies. In "Mail", Baggot (Beery) tries to rob a wagon with Tucker (Main) on board. He interrupts another robber who also thought there was gold to be had. Darryl Hickman is Tommy, who gets a delivery, the center of all the trouble. Tucker seem to have a myriad of occupations... she drives a mail coach, and dances and sings on the saloon stage. Not really much of a plot here...or maybe too many sub plots. When Tommy's dad is knocked off, he goes to live with Baggot, which appears to be out in the woods. Kind of feels like they they had Main and Beery sitting around, so they wrote a story around em. Not the best work for either of them. Tucker decides they want the railroad to come to town, so halfway through, we go with that storyline. This film seems to have several sub stories, which come to an end when another begins. Written by Gardner Sullivan, who had started in the silents, like Beery, and had worked with him waaay back in 1924. Sullivan was also involved with "All Quiet on the Western Front", two Oscars, so that one had a much tighter storyline. It's OK, but I think they tried to work in too many stories. They should have tightened up the script and gone with less sub stories. It's still fun to see two greats like Main and Beery at work.

cherimerritt Not a dull moment. Great chemistry between Marjorie Main and Wallace Berry AND between Wallace Berry and Darryl Hickman. I especially enjoyed little Tommy guilelessly busting Baggot when he was up to his old tricks. It was precious and refreshing.Marjorie Main's style of dealing with men is a lesson in the direct approach made charming and irresistible.J. Carrol Naish as a Mexican up-to-no-good tempter of Berry behind the scenes but Marjorie's entertaining buddy in front of her was also a very amusing departure from his usual roles.It was definitely worth staying up for.

pyoobez I caught this movie last night on Turner Classic Movies, and I have to say it was a lot better than I expected. Yes, it was definitely a B-movie but it still stands up today, over sixty years later. Beery and Main, as well as the script have enough development, so that the two come off as more than just cookie cutter characters. In addition to the leads, Naish did a fine performance as a 'sidekick/comedy' character and young Tommy played by Hickman put in a good performance as well.I consider this a 'fun' movie and I'd watch it again if I caught it on, or even consider purchasing it on DVD if it were available. (An online search shows a few scattered notes of it being a rare find.) At approximately 80 minutes in duration, the timing is near perfect for the storyline.Finally, I do believe there is a bit more to this movie than what meets the eye. With the topics they cover, I was left wondering how different it could have/be done if they delved deeper and darker into some of the elements.7/10. If you have the means to catch this lost gem, it's worth it.

jgl-4 This is the second or the Beery's mule pictures in the early 1940's. I enjoyed it. Not because it's a great western - it's not. It's simple B fair. But what it is seems to transcend the normal B schlock and it's mostly due to Beery and Main. If you don't disect it - you'll love it!