kingjoneva I guess because I read some of the reviews before watching this movie I was able to watch it with an open mind. This was obviously a movie that didn't take itself seriously and anyone watching it should do the same. This was a movie that reminded me of The Kentucky Fried Movie from back in the day. This was a campy throwback to the type of movies you could expect to see back when little local stations handled our late night entertainment, before Netflix, Hulu, and 24 hour streaming services were available. Some of us are old enough to remember those glorious days. So sit back, relax, and get a little nostalgic with this mildly entertaining film would be my suggestion.

louis-ortiz-170-176575 I think what a lot of people are missing is that it's a B movie. They're not trying to remake Gone With The Wind here, people! It's gory, it's funny, it's got a hidden message if you think about it. Nurse Nancy gets whipped by her co-host On Air! And she's told to just "stick it out and hang in there"? WTF Hollywood? But the movie itself is pretty solid for a B flick. It's definitely worth seeing if your hanging with your buddies drinking and you want a laugh. But I think even if your drunk, you'll have a problem with the whipping scene. But even the commercials in the movie were tongue in cheek. But if you watched it and were expecting something like Scream or Saw, your going to be SEVERELY let down. But if you want to watch something that you know you'll enjoy for what it is, a B movie, then pull up a chair and enjoy the ride!

Kate Grierson This film is both a campy and tongue in cheek roller coaster ride. It's great fun and a true hats off to themes and styles of the horror flicks of the 50 and 60's. The anthology format keeps things moving along and the interwoven story line is a clever approach. Keep your sense of fun when you watch this one! Totally enjoyed!

rhardy-390-701341 Welcome to the new era of bad movies with high ratings !Now, this is not the same as it used to be, where people who were fans of B flicks. Oh no, this is on a MUCH GREATER level of WTF!?!?!The new phase of millennial movie pleasure stems from the worst equate to the better. Bad acting IS a plus. WTF?!?!?! CGI, gore,blood or any prosthetic that looks like an arm from a department store equates to sheer pleasure for this audience of viewers.The movie, for those of you born prior to 1982, is horrid. Bad acting, worst effects and a plot that...well, simply does not exist :) Imagine HOSTEL level gore with cigarette money investment. I understand these appeal to a newer group of viewers that even B fans shake their heads at, but how to rectify this ? IMDb needs another CHECK BOX group beside reviews :)A simple click your star does not suffice. There needs to be ANOTHER bar that indicates age. So when you see 900 people give it a 8 star and are 17-24 and then see that 500 people give it a 3 or lower are 30-50, you then have a VIABLE option when considering the "Am I wasting money or am I paying for what I MAY view as entertainment" If you like basement level movies, this is for you ! If you like horror along the lines of "The Strangers" or "Wolf Creek" (We already know it's no Hostel) then this is NOT for you.This is one of those movies that is SO BAD it will not be considered "Worst" of a period because of the minimal funds invested to make it. Yes, this is more like a class project that someone suckered an investor for and the bulk of the funds were spent on beer bongs and prostitutes.BUT ! If you ARE a "Silly/bad" millennial horror fan, this one should tickle you pink!