Eric Stevenson The original "Rosemary's Baby" is one of my favorite horror movies and it's great that the ending left it all ambiguous and open to interpretation. That is, until this stupid TV sequel was made. There are almost no good direct to video sequels to theatrically released movies and it looks like the same can be said for TV movie sequels to theatrically released movies. This movie is unbearably stupid and bland. It features Rosemary taking care of her child at 7 years old, but then she's lured onto a haunted bus. It's so strange because I doubt if I've ever seen a bus with no driver in a movie before, but this scene STILL came off as completely clichéd. We get lame stuff like slow motion and satanic curses.The two main Satanists are this guy and his wife. His wife is amazingly annoying and it doesn't even seem like she's trying to be serious. So anyway, after Rosemary disappears, a cultist raises her son. They discuss having the Satanists raise him, but decide not to, because they don't want him to live a sheltered life. He ends up living a sheltered life anyway. They perform a ritual to um, turn him into a monster or something, I don't know and they give him makeup like in KISS. Someone gets electrocuted and then the guy wakes up in a hospital. Apart from the stupid story, it's completely boring and wouldn't please any horror movie fan or any movie fan for that mirror.It seems like everything is just shot poorly. It hasn't aged well at all. I might have seen a low quality version, but it doesn't really matter. The movie ends with a woman having Rosemary's son's baby. That means we're back exactly where we were at the end of the original film. That means this entire film was completely pointless as the world doesn't end, nor is the world saved. In the original film, you never even got to see the baby at the end. This just shows how important it is to make the audience come up with their own story. We don't want to see what happens next and there's almost no way a sequel to this movie could ever be good. This actual sequel doesn't ruin the original classic, but it's still a piece of crap. *

jacobjohntaylor1 Look what happens when a crappy movie like Rosemary's Baby is more popular then it deserves to be. The end up making sequel. One that is better then the original but mind you not mush better. This is pretty bad. It has an awful ending. It is badly written. It is not scary. Don't wast your money. Don't see this movie. It is pooh. A big pile of think pooh. The first one is no better. In fact it is worst. Life is to short for a movie this bad. The son of Satan is now a man. And most chose to be good or evil. This could have been a good movie. If it was not so badly written. I don't how the first one could have been good. But this one could have been. But it is not. Do not see it.

moonspinner55 Sam O'Steen, the film editor on the superlative suspense flick "Rosemary's Baby" from 1968, here directs a quickie TV-made sequel, one in which Rosemary Woodhouse (Patty Duke Astin, in for Mia Farrow) is shunted off early--and inexplicably--presumably to help flesh out the more ghoulish aspects of this flaccid story about Satan's son on Earth. Most interesting is the return of Ruth Gordon to her Oscar-winning role as Minnie Castevet (with Ray Milland well-cast as her husband, Roman), but she isn't given much to do--and looks terribly uncomfortable at being involved anyway. This script is strictly low-rent goods, and must have shamed original author Ira Levin (who went on to write his own sequel). Fairly dim and pallid, with poor photography and no suspense or scares whatsoever.

preppy-3 I think "Rosemary's Baby" is the most overrated horror film out there. Not scary, interesting or much of anything. It's reasonably well-directed and Ruth Gordon was wonderful but that's about it. But this sequel makes it look like "Gone With the Wind"!I caught this on TV back when I was 14. Unfortunately, I still remember it. From what I remember Rosemary's baby Andrew is now grown up and the coven wants him to start taking over (the world that is). But there are forces trying to stop it...and Andrew is having doubts himself...I'm giving this a 2 for a few reasons: Gordon is in this (and still very good); Stephen McHattie was actually pretty good as Andrew and there is one spooky moment at the beginning with Rosemary (Patty Duke) being "kidnapped" by a bus...with no driver.Other than that it's dull, silly and needless. The original didn't NEED a sequel! Ira Levin's book followup in 1999 wasn't much better.Tune in for the beginning with Duke...then tune out. Not worth the effort.