Out of Reach

2004 "It's a split second between hit or miss."
Out of Reach
4| 1h25m| R| en| More Info
Released: 12 November 2004 Released
Producted By: Epsilon Motion Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Vietnam veteran Billy Ray Lancing, a former CSA agent who now works on a wildlife refuge in Northern Alaska, has been exchanging letters in a pen-pal relationship with Irina Morawska, a 13-year-old orphaned girl in Poland that he's helping out financially. When the letters suddenly stop coming, Billy heads to Poland to figure out why -- only to discover that the orphanage that Irina was staying in, which is financed by honest -- and unsuspecting -- good-intentioned Samaritans, is a cover for a human trafficking network.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Epsilon Motion Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Frederick Smith Steven Seagal is perhaps the King of the B films, but he is also a cause driven individual who likes to make films that center around real problems. Renowned for his ability as a martial artist and his "I don't take any $h!@ from anyone." attitude, Seagal's films have unfortunately become formulaic and predictable. Seagal plays the former agent who has become disenchanted with the agency (Which agency? Does it really matter?) Naturally, he is in the wilderness, this time on a wildlife preserve, and is sponsoring an orphaned girl in Poland. While there are some moments of emotion, most of the time Steven plays the role with a lack of luster and motivation, like he is tired of making the same film for the 100th time. Matt Schulze is the one actor in the cast who stands out. His portrayal of Faisal, the operator of the human trafficking ring, is one dimensional, but its the right dimension. If you're going to be a bad guy, be a really bad guy. Nick Brimble's brief appearance is good, but Nick comes off as the man behind the scenes and his threat to Faisal lacks the true tone of contempt anyone would show for a man in that business. Overall, the film is slow to the point of boredom, predictable as a clock, and just plain poorly done. Rated R for violence, language, and a few scenes in an upscale brothel. If you happen to see this one on the shelf at your local video store, I'd let it collect dust, unless you are a big fan of Seagal, and even then I would take a moment and think about it.
maddogdavies For those browsing the shelves of your local film rental establishment and perhaps entertaining the idea of renting this film, let me give a quick summary to save you any unwanted trauma (and wasted cash).This is basically the same Seagal film formula which has been applied to all of his recent movies: Seagal plays the usual ex-military/CIA/clandestine agency/secret hard bloke who has retired to the countryside, living amongst the animals, his house festooned in native American memorabilia, who for some preposterous reason ends up in Eastern Europe busting up a criminal gang (usually led by a corrupt businessman). And of course there is the obligatory love scene with an attractive girl thirty odd years his junior (who is he kidding)- please note, I'm writing this review before seeing the whole thing, but I'm fairly confident in it's predictability. The plot of this movie sees Seagal (as described above)somehow involved with a young Polish girl living in an orphanage whom he exchanges letters with. She gets kidnapped by a human trafficking gang and well, you can probably guess the rest.The most (unintentionally)amusing thing about this film is the dialogue. Half of Seagal's dialogue has been re-recorded by another actor with a completely different voice! I don't know if this was because he couldn't be arsed or whether the producers changed the story after filming (as with one of his others, can't remember the name), who knows.All in all, this film had a preposterous plot, abysmal acting, sub-standard fight/action scenes (Seagal is dreadfully out of shape and slow) and the overall production values worse than Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus! Coupled with the comical dialogue, this film was farcical from start to finish! For the record, I do enjoy Seagal's earlier films (Under Siege, Out For Justice), but to be quite frank he should have packed it in long ago!
Scarecrow-88 Steven Seagal stars as a former CSA agent, William Lansing, who discovers an orphan girl he corresponds with, Irena(Ida Nowakowska) has been kidnapped by Poland human traffickers, joining forces with a Warsaw detective, Kasia(Agnieszka Wagner) to find her(and to stop this whole sleazy operation by eliminating all those involved). Matt Schulze is the loathsome creep, Colonel Faisal, behind the whole human trafficking network, with plenty of foreign clientèle willing to pay big bucks for pretty girls yet of age. The CSA must be some sort of shadowy organization who send out assassins to remove specific targets for political reasons. It's a past Lansing wishes to cleanse himself of, yet those who were once his associates, will not allow him to. Robbie Gee is a former partner, Lewis, who seems to have a shaky history with Lansing. Actually, OUT OF REACH is one of Seagal's lesser violent outings, and his character is more humane and tender-hearted than in other action fare where he annihilates a host of scumbags. Sure there's a shootout in a high class brothel, but there aren't a vast number of action set-pieces Seagal flicks are known for. I think the choice of villains, both the human traffickers and the CSA willing to help out these cretins to remove "an old dog who needs to be put out of his misery", are perfect slime for Seagal to euthanize. Still, you would expect, for instance, a major set piece to erupt in the Turkish Embassy Ball, or in that enormous castle where Faisal has laid down roots, but really there are few adrenaline-pumping sequences showing men being blown apart by bullets or hoods getting pummeled by Seagal. I'm frank in that these flicks, which are most often than not generic and predictable, should at least give us what we expect. Anyway, the climax where Lansing and Faisal duel, with swords(Faisal is a fencing geek) as Irena watches, is less than spectacular. Schulze is all growl and no bite. That's been a major problem, I think, in many of Seagal's films, a worthy adversary for his heroes to combat. While Seagal continues the always reliable "silent, man of few words" routine, I thought he had good chemistry with Wagner. Jan Plazalski portrays a kid named Nikki who was in the orphanage at the time the girls were carted off to be potential call girls in training, assisting Lansing with identifying those involved in despicable operation.
daworldismine steven seagal has got many kick ass action flicks out there, sadly this ain't one of them, this time we find seagal writing to and supporting a young orphan girl, and when one day she is took away to be used as prostite, seagal goes looking for her, i mean come on the story alone is bad, steven seagal goes to rescue pen pal it's laughable, and while there are some decent little action scenes, there is nowhere near enough and that remains one of the films biggest flaws there is simply not enough action in it, sure there's more than the patriot but simply not enough, overall possibly one of seagal's worst movies if not the worse, come on seagal you can do better than that you used to be the king of action flicks