jjwilliamshaha Okay first off we're looking at the dark side off national lampoon's. which seems to emerge in constantly in the form of straight-to-DVD cheesy comedies! given this fact, i expect nothing spectacular when i see national lampoon's above the title of a movie that never hit theaters. there is sooooo much to say about this piece of garbage excuse for a movie. for starters it has the staring role of Paris Hilton, yeah, things are looking bad already, that just guarantees you a bad movie. another thing is that this movie features no productive story line whatsoever! seriously, there's barely a plot!! and the jokes. ugh!! the jokes are just awful and cheesy and pathetic, it feels like the jokes were written by an immature 7th grader. there is also POINTLESS narration by Paris Hilton that in no way applies to the story! bottom line this movie is just plain garbage, it should be used to torture people!

pcernea-1 It's hard to put into words what's so inhumanly bad about this movie. You have to see it to understand, but be warned that this isn't one of those so-bad-it's-good flicks. There's something deeply perverse about this movie. Now a lot of movies are full of perverted humor and are very funny, there are many more that are full of lewd humor and are not so funny, but this one is not only unfunny. There's a sadistic undercurrent to it all.This film is like a propaganda piece made a by a dictator in an attempt to seem self-effacing: it only makes him appear more ruthless. Here Paris Hilton thinks she is making fun of a "hot chick" image she imagines herself to have! Instead of humor, however, follows a series of unbelievably barbaric and dehumanizing hazing ritual/pranks inflicted upon other girls and Hilton's boyfriend. For instance, getting the girls to pick up used condoms which results in their bouncing a ball of used condoms; getting the girls to advertise themselves as sl*ts by the side of the road; fooling the boyfriend into copulating with a poodle. Intentionally or not, there's something about the way the movie's shot which makes it seem as if this is to be enjoyed, that Paris is enjoying it, and that's what makes the movie especially disturbing.I don't know to what extent the plot and feel of the movie are the brainchild of Paris, so maybe she's not the one to blame. But she seems right at home in the movie. If this movie came from any one mind, it must either be a twisted mind or a vapid mind, probably both. This tripe makes "1 Night In Paris" look like Casablanca. It makes a classic like "Animal House" look tasteful, and so it is, because any gross and irreverent humor is included with precise effects in mind, not shoveled on gratuitously. Even "American Pie" seems highbrow in comparison!

metalhaid-780-968842 I wish I could give this a negative 10. This was the worst waste of time ever. I want to sue the writers for an hour of my life that I will never get back. What's so bad about it? Where to begin-the ridiculous attempts at comedy, the absolutely evil mean bitches in this POS, the completely hateful protagonists...I don't think this is a spoiler by saying Paris Hilton is a HORRIBLE actress and an even worse narrator. The men in this movie are pathetic and contemptible. One longs for Freddy Krueger to come crashing through the sets and start cleaning house--like some avenging angel of justice, setting the scales straight in the direction of real life. The writers have the lion's share of blame for this atrocity. The Paris character should have been held up for the ridicule that she is held in by the rest of the world. Where are the drug jokes? Where are the porn flick jokes? Why didn't they write in a scene where drugs fell out of her purse and she claims they aren't hers? But we all know the writers are just the pawns of the producers and unable to accurately portray the Paris we all know and hate. Well, EFF YOU, Paris. You are a carbuncle on the anus of the world.

charlytully . . . FULLY CLOTHED!!! Okay, if you play with your remote's "pause" and "zoom" for a while at 59:40, you might be able to quibble a little, but really, who would actually bother? What's there to see, when you really come down to it? And speaking of Paris, how many flicks offer viewers the chance to compare the self-styled Hotel Hottie's acting skills against those of Carmen Electra? (Has Dennis Rodman considered marrying Paris for a few minutes? It could get his name back in the news, if he goes as Half-and-Half, as in half tux, half white train.)When all is said and done, if this movie--PLEDGE THIS!--does not deserve its current infamy as the 25th-lowest rated film of all time, it certainly checks in on National Lampoon's bottom 25. (Oh, wait, it's pretty much the SAME LIST! Silly me!)