Prince of Foxes

1949 "King of Romantic Epics!"
Prince of Foxes
6.9| 1h47m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 23 December 1949 Released
Producted By: 20th Century Fox
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

In 1500, Duke Cesare Borgia hopes to marry his sister to the heir apparent of Ferrara, which impedes his conquest of central Italy. On this delicate mission he sends Andrea Orsini, his sister's lover and nearly as unscrupulous as himself. En route, Orsini meets Camilla Verano, wife of the count of Citta' del Monte, and sentiment threatens to turn him against his deadly master, whom no one betrays twice...

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

20th Century Fox

Trailers & Images

Reviews

deickos This was the film by Henry King I least liked - the production is alright but nothing really happens for me until... The supposed blinding scene and the (not so) supposed happy ending. Let me explain myself and hopefully Henry King - this grand master: there are two different versions and two different endings provided simultaneously! This is only done in Shakespeare - As you like it. One for the audience and one for the few.
ilprofessore-1 One of the first grand scale Hollywood historical melodramas shot entirely on location throughout Italy and at Cinecitta in 1948-9 only a few years after the Second World War, this film benefits from its believable historical settings. Superbly composed and photographed in B&W by one of Zanuck's best cinematographers, Leon Shamroy, and costumed lavishly by the great Vittorio Nino Novarese, the visual aspects of this film add an unusual authenticity to the story. In addition, we have some grand theatrical acting from such classic scene-stealers as the great Katina Paxinao from Greece, England's Felix Alymer (Polonius to Olivier's Hamlet) and America's own wunderkind Orson Welles reunited with his Bernstein from Citizen Kane, Everett Sloane. (Watching Sloane's performance in this film one can only regret that he did not play Iago to Orson's Othello.) The beautiful but rather wooden Wanda Hendrix as Camilla Verana can't compete in this superb ensemble, all directed masterfully by the underestimated Henry King, but the overall effect is magnificent. Who said you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Not if the sow is Italian!
blanche-2 Despite a comment that Darryl F. Zanuck refused Tyrone Power's pleas to make "Prince of Foxes" in color because he was angry with his star, this is not true. The film was probably made with Italian funds that the studio couldn't get out of the country, and there just wasn't enough money to do this richly-produced film in color. Zanuck was too much of a businessman to let anger ruin a good opportunity. And why would he have been angry? Power was doing another swashbuckler like the big man ordered, wasn't he?Despite not being in color, "Prince of Foxes" is a glorious-looking film, made on location in Italy. It's based on the Shellabarger novel about Andrea Orsini, a peasant with a fake royal name, who is sent by Cesare Borgia to infiltrate the court of Count Verrano, seduce his wife, and get rid of him so that Borgia's troops can take over his province. Orsini, however, double-crosses his boss.The acting is marvelous - Tyrone Power is wonderful as the turncoat Orsini, and manages to hold his own against the flashier roles of Cesare Borgia (Orson Welles) and Belli (Everett Sloane). Though I doubt that Welles was terribly into his part, as usual he's excellent. When doing a role strictly for money, he had the habit of arching his eyebrow and intoning that glorious voice to make the audience believe he was doing something. It's only when one sees him as Citizen Kane or in a film like "Tomorrow is Forever" that one realizes these later supporting roles are phoned in. But who better to make the call than master technician Welles. Sloane does a fantastic job as a man who just can't stay loyal to one side and pulls one of the film's big surprises. The part is cut down from the book, which is a pity.The music, the scenery - amazing. The great halls are like nothing you've ever seen. For once, Tyrone Power has competition for beauty! By the time of Prince of Foxes, he was totally sick of these roles, but he had a few years left before Zanuck turned him loose. It's said that he was too old to be a swashbuckler by 1949 - he was 35, which today is nothing, though he often had to play parts that were intended for someone 10 or even 15 years younger. As a result, he sometimes looked tired out. But not here. Perhaps this film was more tolerable for him because of his impending marriage to Linda Christian, his second wife. In any event, he comes off very well.One thing I never understood is why Zanuck insisted on casting the post-war Power opposite these vapid starlets - Wanda Hendrix in this, Cecile Aubry in "The Black Rose," Jean Peters in "Captain from Castile" etc. - of these, the only "find" was the wonderful Peters. Hendrix is okay in "Prince of Foxes" but that's about it. The role called for a little more depth than she was able to give.All in all, beautiful to watch, an intriguing story, excellent acting. Recommended, and, by the way, soon to be released in DVD as part of the Tyrone Power Collection.
gerrythree From the VHS recording I made of Prince of Foxes on Cinemax 8 years ago (as I recall, part of their Summer series of movies not yet out on video), this movie looks as if it was shot in color. Those castle interior scenes are too dark and DP Leon Shamroy too accomplished a technician to film the movie in such subdued lighting. Somewhere in the Fox archives, there may be records to show if Prince of Foxes was originally intended to be a Technicolor release. The most likely reason 20th Century Fox released the movie in black and white is cost, after Zanuck decided that the potential box office of the movie did not justify the greater expense of making the release prints in Technicolor. Or, the reason could be that some of the filmed material turned out for technical shortcomings not to be able to be processed correctly for Technicolor by the film lab. The cost for retakes would have been prohibitive, since the movie was filmed on location in Italy. So, my opinion is that the studio took the cheap way out, processing a black and white negative from the Technicolor film negative, figuring the audience would not notice how the timing was way off.If there is still a surviving Technicolor negative of this movie in the Fox film archives stored in some cave somewhere, shot in the three strip Technicolor process, there is now computer technology available to correct any defects in the original negative.On another note, the director Henry King liked low angle shots as much, if not more, than director Michael Bay. This movie is loaded with low angle shots, sometimes to take advantage of the castle backgrounds, sometimes to show a person's bad situation, as when the bound Orsini looks up at Borgia at the dinner table. In 1949, Henry King had been a director for 30 years, and he picked up some good tricks along the way. Too bad 20th Century Fox didn't spring for a Technicolor release of Prince of Foxes.