Nicole C The story of a blind photographer is certainly an interesting one. The film doesn't show us how Martin makes a living, but he does seem to live quite a comfortable life. The reason he photographs is so he can have proof that what he thinks is out there corresponds to what people describe to him from his photos. This is what Andy mainly does at the beginning. Martin gives him photographs, and Andy describes them to him which Martin can then label. However, the flaw about this is how can Martin possible remember each photograph he takes? Either he would forget at least the majority of the pictures he takes at any day, so when he goes to develop them he wouldn't really know where they are from. Or, after he has labelled them and revisits them, how would he remember what the words mean in relation to the photograph? There is no time or place assigned to the feel or words of the label, which is especially hard to achieve without visual aids (unless he has 'photographic memory'). Weaving does a pretty good job at his character, and you can definitely get the sense of his character's dry wit. The tension between him and Celia is one I find very awkward, especially as Celia is always coming on to him. In this way, Picot does a great job with her character, depicting someone whose whole world is centred on this one person. I also enjoy the way she would randomly disrupt furniture pieces so that Martin would bump into them later. It's just so unnecessary and done out of spite that makes it laugh out loud worthy. Crowe as well does great, and his relationship with Weaving is well elaborated and depicted. There are essentially the three characters of this film, and they all interweave in each other's life in drastic ways, producing sound character development. However, the film moves at quite a slow pace, and there are countless scenes in which the characters just stare at each other in silence- or in Martin's case, sit in silence. This somewhat adds intensity to the film (dark humour), and at the same time makes it uncomfortable and awkward to watch. The story is well told, and the editing, cinematography and directing all nicely come together. The set designs - especially of Celia's apartment, tells a lot of the character. I wish there would have been more to Martin's place that could have depicted more of who his character was. His dog is cute, and its disappearance on daily walks for a few minutes is the main mystery Martin wishes to solve. Overall, the film definitely tells an interesting story, but is a little weird. I wouldn't watch it again, or outright recommend it for others to watch.

zx_360 I just saw it and I'm so impressed with this movie. It's mostly a drama with some funny scenes (I literally laughed out loud at one scene particularly which i'm not going to spoil of course but you'll know it as you see it) about a blind man who takes photos (ironic isn't it?) and his relationship with his housekeeper and his new friend. As Russell Crowe one of my favorite actors I can't believe I haven't checked it out earlier, and he sure does a great supporting role but Hugo Weaving takes the prize for leading role in this movie. My only problem with this movie is that I thought it was too short, but like it is an independent film and all I give it a 9/10, watch whenever you can.

whereisbai For months, my movie-going experience had been reduced to blockbusters filled with explosions and bad one-liners. Then I rented Proof, and forgot why I ever wanted to see a car blow up on a screen.This is a very simple, very down-to-earth film. It focuses on three characters - a blind man convinced that everyone will take advantage of his handicap; a lonely woman who does not realize that people cannot be blackmailed or sabotaged into falling in love; and a young, ordinary guy who is trapped between the two. Their story is primarily that of trust, but it is also about absolutes and why humanity needs to overcome them.Although there is nothing earth-shattering about the scenography itself, the film is beautifully shot. The acting is wonderful. Weaving is absolutely convincing as a blind man, and Crowe is so charmingly average and regular that it is hard to believe that this is the same person who gave Hando and Maximus their sublime intensity. There is depth, levity, refined sarcasm, and crude humor - something for everyone. I definitely - and highly - recommend watching it.

httpmom I am not a Russell Crow fan...and while I liked Gladiator...I always thought it would have been better without Crow. That said...I have always liked Hugo Weaving and until I caught this fantastic movie on IFC last night, I thought of him as a steadfast character actor with a terrific accent. Whoa! Think A-G-A-I-N !!! "Poof" sure proved me wrong...Weaving's acting was brilliant and I can give nothing but praise and admiration to the director, Jocelyn Moorhouse for her ability to make such a gripping movie on such a small budget. This movie is all about character development and she is an obvious master at turning the written word into emotional reality. This is a B-I-G (like in red wine) movie! Hugo Weaving's character, Martin is so real you want to touch him! As for Crow...he had it all when he was younger...what the devil happened? Moorhouse is keenly adept at maneuvering your sensitivities. Right from the start you are drawn in to the story...honestly empathizing with this unusual triad of desperately lonely individuals. Nothing about this story is contrived and I think that is where it gets it's power. It's a shame this movie did not get more play but a big thank you to IFC for bringing it to my attention!