Thy Davideth I do get why Robocop 3 sucks an @$$#0!€ clean but I still like this film mainly because of its cyberpunk elements and action. But what makes this third installment the runt of the litter is, as everyone has pointed out, a PG-13 film and it is gay. I hate it when some retards decide to take a beloved R-rated character and turns him into a floater. I hate people.

ivo-cobra8 *SPOILERS* RoboCop 3 is the worst unnecessary terribly sequel ever made in the 90's and it is the biggest dog pile of sh**t ever! It is rated PG-13 a family film so why? This movie has so much problems I can't even begin to count.The first RoboCop was a classic best action rated Hard-R film, the second one was amazing underrated science fiction action film that stays true to the original film. This movie is abomination. A young girl reprograms ED-209 so that he stays a loyal as a puppy! I don't want to see a droid been loyal as a puppy that is horrible wooden and awful lame stinker of a movie.You have two samurais and RoboCop get's his ass kicked by one of the samurais and he doesn't do anything. A little girl safes RoboCop from 2 samurai cyborgs so that they destroy each other with their swords. Awful.There is no Peter Weller in this movie I am glad that he pass this movie to do other projects. Nancy Allen returns she is hot in this movie but by the first hour she is killed off! Why? What happened why did Nancy Allen insist to be in this movie only to get her character killed off? So that she could get a paycheck? What is wrong with her.What happened? Why did Frank Miller and Fred Dekker made such a terrible script? The screenplay is terrible the dialogues in here are terrible not memorable and pretty dull. Was it because ORION had a finical problems and in a desperate attempt they try to make a family action PG-13 movie to get more audiences? sadly this movie failed! Peter Weller, Dan O'Herlihy and Belinda Bauer did not return, the movie it self doesn't have an adrenaline or rush excitement or anything. This movie sucks ass. Robert John Burke makes terrible type of RoboCop he is awful and another STINKER cop again.His suit is awful I hate that RoboCop has a Gun Arm and he replaces his awesome gun from the first two movies with a machine gun on his left arm wow stupid. Why RoboCop has a prototype flight-pack and he flies after he was ass kicked by a samurai. Gosh the effects for this movie were horrible and really poor.This movie is poor and really a shame it could have been a good movie but it turned in to a lack of pile of sh**t. I hate this movie I hate it, why couldn't have been a good movie why?Fred Dekker really make a terrible horrible direction and I don't really like it a lot. This time they used music from Basil Poledouris in which audience complained about the music in the second movie but even the music score does not help and make this movie unique like the first one was it doesn't. This Robocop in here is awful and this movie stinks Frank Miller you make a lousy sequel that no one wants.I do have this movie on Blu-ray disc and I am not going to broke it or throw it away like mostly people do I am going to keep it in my collection but I am not going to watch it anymore because I HATE this movie to death!I am giving this movie F 1/10 doesn't deserve to be called RoboCop 3 by the way the acting from everyone is wooden and terrible in here and RoboCrap is a wooden bitch in here. This and RoboCock (2014) are both stinkers and they both suck a dick. They both can kiss my ass!

Dzemal Velic major spoilers. Its a good movie, you picky bastards. I watched all the movies in one day. Oooh, it is not an adult movie anymore with so much violence. Yes there was more violence in the first Robocop and it was more fun. However, if that movie had so much violence it does not mean that the next should have the same amount or more violence.OMG he is flying, how could they. I do not see what is wrong with Robocop having a jetpack, i thought it was pretty awesome. Also he has gotten another upgrade. Instead of only that gun he now has watched Scarface and said hello to the little friend. So to compensate for the lack of violence he uses this weapon. Also, there were ninjas. RoboCop vs Ninjas. Yes they could have been better and have more equipment. However I do not agree with people who say the first ninja was overpowered and RoboCop should have no trouble with him. RoboCop is slow and the ninja is fast and can cut through steel. Also Robocop just met him and did not know him and his moves. And yes the ninja is also a robot. What I really liked is what there was less of. Prime directive 4 is gone. You know, that thing that kept him from arresting that Dick in the first movie. Now I am not saying it is the best movie, but it is not that bad. I actually really liked it, except when officer Lewis died because she was stupid enough not to wear her armor. The rebels were protecting their home, and I would do that too. So I like that. So, it is clear I like the movie much more than a lot of people.

Maziun "Robocop" is a classic science fiction movie that didn't had too much luck with the sequels. "Robocop 2" was a flawed , but decent sequel that was almost universally hated by the audiences and the critics. Too bad , because it stayed true to the original. It didn't had the freshness , depth or heart of the first one , yet the violent action and dark satire was still there. The franchise still had potential and I believe that with some effort there was still a chance for interesting next installments. Unfortunately the Orion studio had financial problems . They decided to make "Robocop 3" as a family friendly action movie rated PG-13 in desperate attempt to gain as wide audience as it is possible. "Robocop 3" was filmed in 1991, but was not released until end of 1993 due to production company Orion going bankrupt. The result ? A movie that is one of the worst movies EVER and a final nail to the franchise coffin.Making a "Robocop 3" movie with PG-13 rating makes just as much sense as making a porn movie with no sex at all ( maybe with some brief nudity here and there). IT"S TOTALLY MISSING THE POINT of the original movie ! It has no heart, no brains, sly social commentary and no hard violence. "Robocop 3" became the very thing that first two movies were often laughing at – a politically correct hero in a gutless , soulless and brainless Hollywood movie.To be honest a PG-13 "Robocop 3" movie COULD work. The story has some potential and you can make a exciting and deep PG-13 action movie ("The Dark knight"). Unfortunately the whole movie seems to be aimed at kids and has a cartoon approach to it that just doesn't works. I'm amazed that this even is rated PG-13 , not PG.Peter Weller made a wise decision not returning to the role of Robo and choosing "Naked lunch" to do instead. I recommend to watch that movie instead of "Robocop 3" . It may not be for everyone , but at least it's entertaining. Orion tried to hire Michael Dudikoff ("American ninja") , but ended with Robert Burke . I can't say anything else about him except that he was in this movie. And that for some reason the studio modified his voice so it sounds annoying. Dan O'Herlihy, the old man from the first two films, does not appear in this film. The rest of the regular cast is back , unfortunately they don't have too much to do.Robocop here is basically a zombie with no personality. He also disappears for a large part of the movie. The regular cast has very little screen time and awful dialogue to work with. The new characters are annoying , especially Nico – kid genius hacker. The main villain is not one bit interesting or menacing. The acting here is awful with people either underplaying or overplaying their parts.The story here takes some elements from what comic book writer Frank Miller prepared for "Robocop 2" . Mind that both "Robocop 2" and "Robocop 3" were heavily rewritten and have only few elements from Miller's original script. The story here could work. Unfortunately the screenplay is filled with cheap humor , predictability and stupidity. I found a site on internet which points out that "Robocop 3" has faults in every scene ! The direction by Fred Dekker is apathetic. The pacing is lackluster. The action scenes are pathetic. The special effects are embarrassing , especially when you consider that "Jurassic Park" was in theaters that same year.This movie deserves every bad comment it gets. There are no redeeming qualities to this junk. After this movie there were two lame TV shows and cartoon. The franchise was slaughtered. I give it 1/10.