Scent of a Woman

1992 "Frank Slade has a plan. It includes a weekend of fast cars, the tango, high living and a loaded forty five. And Charlie is coming along for the ride."
8| 2h36m| R| en| More Info
Released: 23 December 1992 Released
Producted By: Universal Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Charlie Simms is a student at a private preparatory school who comes from a poor family. To earn the money for his flight home to Gresham, Oregon for Christmas, Charlie takes a job over Thanksgiving looking after retired U.S. Army officer Lieutenant Colonel Frank Slade, a cantankerous middle-aged man who lives with his niece and her family.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Universal Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

emilkarabeg The act of Al Pacino leaves me speechless. The sentences in the movie are genius. This movie regularly improves my mood and fills me with energy. Plain, school and dance scene are irreplaceable. In one word the movie is uuuuuhaaaaaaa
Andy Even after 25 years this movie still nails it - pathos, power, humility, humour and humanity. Pacino "whoo ha" plays a blinder (pun intended) and O'Donnell is outstanding as the principled, doe-eyed debutant. Lessons for life aplenty in this movie. May seem a little schmaltzy in places but packs a punch with its lessons for life.
deickos Although I like the Italian version, and although I think the American takes too long, I am for the latter. The American film has two main characters and thus a more complex and more interesting plot. I believe Pacino is the Academy winner, that deserves this distinction most (besides Brando of course). I can only think of Russel Crowe giving a memorable performance in recent years - I am not for the D.D. Lewis guy.
suze-4 Al Pacino deserved his Oscar for this role. Right on this page is a link to an article about Oscars that were "mistakes"and that includes this one. I just saw this again for the first time since I saw it in the theatre in 1992. It still moved me. This was not a sympathy Oscar. It was fully deserved. Pacino was brilliant and I am so fed up when I come across this kind of reassessment which implies that the entire Academy voted in some temporary trance. No. I am so tired of people saying this movie is only known for the "hu-ah." Hardly. How about actually watching it to the end. It's about morality and the human spirit. A blind, broken vet finding a common humanity and bonding with a young student who is hired to look after him. They both have something vital to offer to each other through the course of the few days they spend together. No, it's not a shoot-em-up western or a violent mafia bloodbath or a sci-fi CGI blockbuster. It's an old style human drama and you can't help loving the characters. If nothing else will make you want to watch it, you might enjoy seeing the very young Todd Louiso (High Fidelity) and Philip Seymour Hoffman.