kyoung-4 The acting was worse than any porn movie out there. What could the people who made this have been thinking? It was as if they were trying to make a cult film and failed dismally. Characters were one dimensional, completely unbelievable and stilted. The main character's actions were utterly unfathomable - why she would do the things she does is never explained.Simply put - dismally acted, pathetically directed, abysmally written. If I could possibly give this a zero I would have.Why did I watch it to the end? I simply find it hard to believe that anything could be this bad and kept hoping for some redeeming quality. It was kind of like watching a 20 car pile up - you can't look away because it's so shockingly horrifying.Don't waste any time or money on this disaster. All who had something to do with this should be banned from ever working again.

travis-j-rodgers This film has a nice look to it, especially for an indie and seemingly low budget film. The sound is good as well. I was quite impressed by both. Too often, indies/low budgets (not that they're necessarily the same) have problems technically that obscure the gems of the film. In Snapped's case, much the opposite is true.While the acting isn't overall terrible (notably the two female leads...who seemed capable of acting on some level), no one is more than competent. The dialogue was terrible, unrealistic. Several times, I wondered why the director hadn't ordered more takes. Some things just came off as too amateurish.Finally, a problem that plagues many low budget films was present. Without getting into the specifics, there are at least two physical altercations that are basically implausible to the point of stupidity. There are other scenes where the shift in tone between interacting characters is so sudden and unmotivated as to be wholly unbelievable.Not the worst film out there by any stretch of the imagination and I'd love to see what the technical people from this film could do with a real script and actors, but hardly worth a look.

kielcorwin I got this thinking it was a movie but I was wrong. Someone borrowed their moms video camera and taped their friends running around. I want to go into detail about everything thats bad about this but I would be wasting my time. I have to admit the first 30 seconds or so had me believing this was a movie, but two minutes later I wasn't sure if they were joking or not when a fat goth chick starts kicking some guy for gambling debts(they're not joking, she's supposed to be tough). I feel stupid for not seeing it sooner, this is just a horrible attempt at making a movie. I looked up this movie on IMDb and saw "Michael Bien" and thought it was the bad-ass guy from "The Terminator" but thats "Michael Biehn", this movie has some fat guy instead. Bad "acting" is of course the most obvious issue but is't not even the pretend actors fault, the most talented actors couldn't make this stuff believable. Plot holes and no sense. It's not even good in a bad way, Hulk Hogan movies are more entertaining. I'm a fan of independent movies but this sucks, it tries to be a formulaic Hollywood thriller and is everything a independent movie should not be. This movie owes everyone who sees it an apology.

emin karakus A photographer finds herself drawn into a cycle of death and pictures in the horror film SNAPPED. A gallery owner commissions a series of unusual works from young photographer Amy: to collect images of the recently deceased. The job seems impossible, until a series of murders seem to literally fall into her lap, committed for the sole purpose of allowing her to continue with the assignment. As she nears completion, bodies continue to drop, and she slowly starts being driven mad by the death and dismemberment around her. Will she ultimately go to the authorities, or justify the murders by collecting on her valuable job? SNAPPED is a horror film that looks at the fine line separated art and life (and the lack of it!).