Per Johnsen After watching this epic of the so called Battle of the Little Bighorn for the fourth time, I still think this is the film about the event closer to the truth. Better and more accurate than the other films about it put together, even it still much is a Hollywood drama. Althoug this is more of a biographic view of who the person G.A.Custer was, it's good because it gives a comprehensive, duplex and much more objective look on one of the most famous events in American history than other cinematic efforts. Much because the narrator is a Lakota woman,read by Buffy Saint Marie. Still it might would appear more credible if the Lakota woman described it as the Greasy Grass and not Little Bighorn. Perhaps also using Lakota language names on the native leaders would have worked better. I have always missed that actors in epic historical dramas look more like the person they portray. Gary Cole is not the actor I would cast for the Custer role, neither due to his looks or acting performance. On the other hand, Rodney A. Grant as Crazy Horse and in particular Nick Ramus in the small but important part as Red Cloud are as good at they can get. Althoug no picture of Crazy Horse exists, I believe in Grant's appearance, and it's also the first time his cheek wound and the story behind really comes to light. To find anyone with something close to the charisma and looks of Sitting Bull might just be impossible. Aside of that, Wes Studi and not Gordon Tootoosis getting to portray Geronimo in 1993 is more of a mystery. This is so far still the closest anyone did get to describing the Battle of the Little Bighorn in a sincere and objective way, though it may be far from a perfect portrait of the actual main character,George Armstrong Custer.

rick_c I enjoyed this movie. It seemed to provide a fairly accurate illustration of the history of this event. They seemed to be trying to produce something with substance. But, I did not think the casting was even remotely correct for this story. Gary Cole may be excellent at his trade, but he does not have a battle hardened look in this movie and gives the impression of not being used to violence. This is just the look in his eyes, his mannerisms and speaking voice. David Strathairn may also be an excellent actor, but does not have the look of someone who rode through a war and had become battle hardened, as his character Capt. William F. Benteen appeared. He gives an almost intimidated appearance throughout the movie. The real Benteen had a childlike appearance, but looked as ruthless as a snake. Major Marcus Reno was portrayed by Michael Medeiros, who has done fine work for years. In this movie he has a permanently fixed expression of terror and bewilderment throughout the entire film. These characters were all men who had seen death, were used to violence and were ready for battle, but in the movie they all look like pampered business men facing a task they are not qualified to perform. Although I liked the film, I would enjoy a story of this nature, which would have a cast of people whose "vibes" were more in line with the story. That being said, it is an enjoyable film and presents a fairly accurate representation of what history tells us actually happened.

Spikeopath Son Of The Morning Star is a made for TV movie that's directed by Mike Robe, with the teleplay adapted by Melissa Mathison from the novel of the same name written by Evan S. Connell. It stars Gary Cole (George Armstrong Custer), Rosanna Arquette (Libby Custer), Stanley Anderson (Ulysses S. Grant), George Dickerson (Gen. Sherman), Rodney A. Grant (Crazy Horse), Terry O'Quinn (Gen. Alfred Terry), David Strathairn (Capt. William F. Benteen), Dean Stockwell (Gen. Philip Sheridan) & Sheldon Peters Wolfchild (Bloody Knife).Buffy Sainte-Marie narrates as Kate Bighead and location work is at Badlands National Park, South Dakota, Billings, Montana & Buffalo Gap, South Dakota (Kees Van Oostrum the cinematographer) and the music is by Craig Safan. The story tells of George Custer & Crazy Horse and the events prior to, and encompassing, the battle of the Little Bighorn. It's told from the different perspectives of two women, Libby Custer & Kate Bighead.The name Custer and The Battle Of Little Big Horn has become one of the most famous stories of American/Indian history. Numerous books, films and TV shows have taken it as a source for entertainment or historical teachings. Of the many screen adaptations, Son Of The Morning Star is arguably the most fascinating due to its two pronged approach and willingness to explore all the principal characters from both sides of the War. At only three hours in length it's inevitable that not everything is covered, but when judged as a whole the makers here have evidently achieved remarkable results and kept it well balanced. It covers a ten year period that starts in 1866 when Custer was commander at Fort Riley in Kansas; and culminates with the famous battle that occurred in June of 1876.There's some sloppy editing and not all the cast deliver convincingly in their respective portrayals. But everyone and everything about the piece is professional. Be it with the dissection of Custer the man (brave, arrogant, foolish & driven), or showing the Indian's as a complex race-to intelligently letting us into the government and political aspects of the period; Robe's movie is always narratively strong. The action is very well staged and the scenery (in spite of not yet having the DVD remastering it deserves) is very pleasing on the eye. We may never get the complete story in film form, or even one that will be budgeted to the extent of shaking Hollywood to its foundations. But this will do nicely and it's hoped that more people will not only get to see it, but also to hopefully appreciate its attention to detail. 8/10

phj-2 I actually just bought this movie(ebay) for a significant amount. Not because I really thought it was that good, but because I`m totally hung up on the history of native Americans, and especially obsessed with the battle of Little Big Horn. In that respect I was NOT disappointed by this movie.The climactic battle scene was actually very satisfying to me, because i was afraid it would a long wait for nothing. I was eager to see if they had managed to bring the great battle to a realistic scale (3000 thousand warriors, enormous Sioux camp). I was almost completely convinced. Both the choreography and the attention to historical details was flawless! All in all a must for "indians`/western fans" but also watchable for people interested in historical/war dramas. When that is said, this is after all a TV-production, and my review must be seen in that context. 7/10